The covenant of the GPL is that in the face of a software
patent aggressor we must all hang together, lest we all hang
separately. Novell accepted that covenant when you chose to
include the Linux kernel, the GNU C library, and hundreds of
additional works created at no charge to Novell by individuals
in the Free Software community and licensed under the GPL.
It is abundantly clear that Novell and Microsoft took the time
to engineer a circuitous legal path of issuing covenants to
each other's customers, rather than licenses to each other,
in order to circumvent Novell's earlier agreement with the
community of GPL software developers.
In your defense, you offer that Novell has not acknowledged
that Linux infringes upon Microsoft's patents. Let's be
truthful about software patents: there can be no non-trivial
computer program, either proprietary or Free, that does not use
methods that are claimed in software patents currently in force
and unlicensed for use in that program. There are simply enough
patents, on enough fundamental principles, to make this so. If
all software patents were enforced fully, the software industry
would grind to a halt.
Bruce, I have always had my doubts about the efficacy of software patents. In fact, I've had doubts about the entire patent process for many years. These doubts are not new. Wherever technological development has been red hot, the patent system has been more of a hindrance than a help. This was especially true with the case of Edwin Armstrong versus Lee DeForrest concerning the regnerative radio receiver patent. And here we are nearly a century later still arguing about the impact of patent trolling.
One of my brothers is a patent attorney. He has given many seminars and even discussed legislation against patent trolling. It would be nice to get angry at someone for all this hate and discontent. However, the truth is that this is one of those well intentioned paving stones on the road to hell. It's hard to get angry at someone who meant well.
However, we do have every right to get mad at those who abuse the public trust behind the Copyleft. I hope Novell gets a clue, but I'm not holding my breath...
be good to see the petition with all the signatures (but not show email addresses lest the spammer's bots harvest them). it is open petition, after all
SuSE is now owned by Novell, and SUSE Enterprise Linux (server and desktop) and OpenSUSE (supported, directed and funded by Novell) are part of the Microsoft / Novell agreement.
Upon hearing of the Microsoft / Novell agreement and immediately realizing the threat it represents to the open source software movement and GNU/Linux in particular, I replaced SuSE with Debian on all my machines, and I urge you to replace SuSE with a distribution of GNU/Linux which has not taken a stand with Microsoft to suppress and threaten the use, growth and future of other Linux and open source projects.
I think this whole mess has something to say about for-profit Linux distributions and the fact that they will always have a conflict of interest between the community and the balance sheet. I think the economics of Open Source just doesn't really work well for distributions. I tried to make an alternative work with Userlinux, and will try again. I think the best solution is to have a non-profit core with non-monoplistic service vendors around it. Unfortunately, it doesn't look as if Ubuntu is going to be that.
but the real core (Linux kernel and FSF GNU tools) are non-profit already, and now we see if for-profits rise and fall around that center or some get to survive. Plenty of Linux built in to appliances and devices too, probably huge financial successes in that realm that stay under our radar.
These are the commercial (with support) non-embedded GNU/Linux distribution vendors I know of (traitors and/or thieves and/or stock fraudsters don't get a link), going to be interesting to watch how they weather the storms
RedHat - most widely used business distribution in the realm of paid support
Oracle - an Oracle dbms targeted patched version of RedHat, might threaten Redhat's enterprise revenue
Elxlinux - asian distribution with versions from ultrathin client to appliance to server
Mandriva - formed from Mandrake plus Conectiva and Lycoris, coming out of bankruptcy with desktop and server versions
Ubuntu - Debian based for server and workstation, most popular desktop
Novell/SUSE - traitors, made deal with Microsoft to circumvent patent restrictions of GPL 2.0
SCO - thieves (charge money for license to use Linux, released GPL code and are attempting to restrict use of that code in violation of GPL), stock fraudsters (claiming ownership of Unix and Linux which they do not have and making false claims of infringing code to inflate stock price), traitors (attempting to monopolize Linux and other free software)
Anyone know of other commercial distributions with paid support (not just one person consulting)?
Now to work on list of heavy-duty support available for non-commercial Linux....
There are a lot more, although many haven't gotten traction. Linspire, Xandros, look for the list at lwn.net or distrowatch.* Oops, you just did, and used your editor power. Never mind.
sometimes hard to tell from distrowatch type lists which are commercial or not, but I'm going to go through them all and add to that list I made, just because I (surely some other folk too) am interested in watching what happens to them and would like to have list in one place.
Another neat list would be where to get enterprise-grade paid support for the non-commercial distributions, for example HP announced Debian support in August.
Enterprise shmenterprise. Just go to debianhelp.org. The people there probably know as much or more about Debian than anyone you could talk with at HP.
The people there probably know as much or more about Debian than anyone you could talk with at HP. ---------------------------------------- But can you get an expert at 2am in any/every time-zone who is willing/able to stick with you (or just hold your hand if you're a new 'nix sysadmin) until the problem is solved? There's a reason commercial support costs money, and it's not always the level of expertise.
Nah, we're talking guaranteed 2 hour first response, ownership of issue until resolution, certified configurations and of course a mix of open and closed source software. Like say I got on the Debian forum and asked about communications issues to ADIC Scalar tape system hooked via McData switch to HP RX8620 running hot Oracle 9.2 RMAN backup via Veritas Netbackup at 2:00am CST?
I think these but would have to check, off the top of my head some you missed. With that said, I think most distros you can buy paid support from the head dev who releases it
red flag, mepis, rPath, progeny, CentOS, and any of the BSDs most likely. Heck, I bet you can buy Fedora support for that matter.
thanks for the additions, I mean to expand by edit to my post the one I made, and then make another one for datacenter grade support for the non-commercial. Might be a good resource for anyone wanting to scrap Novell/SUSE and finding this article & discussion.
I have serious questions about Athene -- and something that shows the weakness of closed-source software.
Their "graphics superiority" comes from using really good drivers from SciTech Software. That same SciTech announced on 11/16 that they're getting out of that business totally and shopping around their code-base.
On a very ironic note, Alcatel is suing Microsoft over patent violations relating to the X-Box 360 and how it handles video seeking. Apparently this is related to Lucent's lawsuit, against MS for patent violation.
Open Letter to Novell
Bruce Perens has written an open letter to Novell and invites you to add your signature.
Read the entire letter and sign on.