Here are some notes on how to write news postings for
Technocrat.net, and why Technocrat.net is here.
Raison d’être
First, what are we here for? That determines what sort of
postings we're interested in.
Technocrat.net's raison d’être is to empower individuals to
have control over technology, and to empower technological
people to involve themselves in the formation of technology
policy. The alternative would be to have technology, a
tremendous force in our lives, owned and spoon-fed to us by
large companies that control it exclusively - and to an
increasing extent, control us as well.
Scientists, engineers, and programmers understand technology
better than the people who are generally promoting and making
laws around technology. We are best aware of both the
benefits and the pitfalls. Without our participation, the
general public will be led to accept things that aren't good
for democracy and the world. Technocrat.net helps us learn
more about these issues and the politics around them, and
helps us put that knowledge to work.
Who Are We?
We are literally the smartest individuals in technology.
To create a venue for such bright lights, we don't "dumb
down" articles for the general audience, and we maintain a
high intellectual level in discussion. But nor do we
obfuscate or make articles more difficult to read than
necessary. In order to draw people in who should do a
little work to understand the news our article titles are
written to be accessible to most people, and then they can
stretch themselves a bit once they're here. If someone has to
look up "obfuscate" once they're reading an article, we try
to make that easy for them.
Where Do We Come From?
Our heritage is in other movements that empowered the
individual to understand and have power over technology. The
chief of these is the Free Software / Open Source movement,
but there are other similar movements like Amateur Radio and
the general tendency of smart people to tinker.
Slashdot
Another of our roots is a similar site called Slashdot.org .
Slashdot played a formative role as the community voice of
Open Source / Free Software during a time of tremendous
growth in that community. Unfortunately, Slashdot has more
recently abdicated that role to become, in the words of its
editors, "a geek culture site". We recognise the lure of the
mass-market. As we write this, Slashdot is within the top 300
sites on the web by readership, and we congratulate them. But
the serious work is going to need to go on elsewhere. We're
taking up that flag.
Another issue with Slashdot is immaturity. It's rife with
trolls and other detriments to the signal-to-noise ratio. We
start out on a path to improve the level of
discussion over that in Slashdot by eschewing the "Anonymous
Coward" who is rampant there. If you don't want to take
responsibility for your words, they don't belong here. We
encourage you to put your full name in your login, and
participate in all discussion as a known individual. We will
take other measures to maintain the highest possible quality
of discussion as they become necessary.
Writing for Technocrat.net
Obviously, the site won't go anywhere without content, and we
need your help with that.
What's Interesting
There are four main categories of news that we're interested
in:
Technology Policy - The issues that are being discussed
today, or often enough, agreed upon in smoke-filled rooms out
of our sight and control. What the concerns are, how we can
get involved.
Individuals Pursuing Technology - Technology pursued by
individuals, or where the parameters don't allow a big
company to have a lock on the technology, and any opportunity
to learn something new about technology as an individual. A
lot of the Free Software and Amateur Radio stories are in
this category, and under the "learning" subcategory,
programming and construction articles.
General Technology News - Our participants need to be
informed regarding the general advance of technology, both
within and outside of their own fields. So, the creation of a
compact synchrotron, for example, is important. Some fields,
like communications and health, effect all people and we want
to be informed about them.
Managing Our World - Ecology, epidemic disease, and
potentials for widespread disaster go here. There are areas
where technologists best understand the threat and should
take a leading role.
What's Not Interesting
Many of us enjoy these things, but they don't belong here:
sports (including Amateur Radio contesting that doesn't have
a public-service or emergency orientation), gaming,
television, science fiction, product press releases from
vendors, pseudoscience (we have to improve our pseudoscience
filter).
Posting
There are essentially two sorts of postings: one that points
to an article on another site, and one containing an entire
article.
If you see - or write - an article that should interest our
audience, post it here using the "Submit Story" link on the
left. The reward is that you help to inform an entire
community. The risk is that we won't approve your post. Sorry
if that happens, please don't take it too hard. If it's a
post pointing to a story elsewhere, hopefully it hasn't taken
much of your time. If it's a post containing your own
material, you're free to take it elsewhere (actually, you're
free to do that even if we do accept it).
Copyright
Unless we negotiate some other agreement: You retain the
copyright on anything you write here, and can do what you
wish with it. You grant to Perens LLC a separate and
independent copyright on the same work. Either of us can
do what we wish with it. We may use that copyright to
make your work available to others under a "Free" license.
Other People's Copyrights
Don't infringe upon other people's copyrights. That means,
don't just cut and paste a story from another venue here
unless that story is a press release (which is
meant to be republished) or bears licensing that
permits republishing. If the story has a license that allows
republication and you don't own it, note both the copyright
holder and the license in your story, so that we won't think
that you have granted us rights upon the story, and so that
we won't violate the license.
Be Fair With Attribution
If you got something elsewhere, say so and give them
credit by linking back to the original piece. If you don't
attribute something, we will assume you wrote it.
Length
The "preface", the part of the story that appears in our
front page, should be one or two paragraphs. The rest of the
story (if any) should be in the "body" portion and may be as
long as you like.
Style
Write in an "inverted pyramid" style. That means that the
most important fact goes in the first sentence, then the
second most important fact, and so on followed by facts of
progressively diminishing importance. This allows the reader
to get the most from any story without necessarily reading
the entire story. When the facts reach a level that isn't
important for that particular reader, that reader will
click the "next" button.
Links
Include links, making it as easy as possible for the user to
access the interesting parts of the story. It's OK for the
links to be in the preface. We're more interested in
informing the reader than having them click-through to the
story page on our site and see another ad.
Provoke Discussion
Ask a question in your story, to provoke discussion.
Participation will add value to the story.
How Stories Are Published
If you have not been granted Author privilege on this
site, a posting you write will be stored for one of our
editors to review it. The editor will decide whether to
publish or delete your posting. If you have the Author
privilege, a story will appear on the front page as soon as
you submit it. If you've written a few stories for us
successfully and want the Author privilege, please
ask. We will grant it or not depending on how well we feel
you can judge your own work according to our editorial
parameters. This is not the easiest thing to do, and
sometimes we'll gently ask you to keep working with the
editors. We can also remove the Author privilege
arbitrarily - generally because you've not judged your own
work as well as we'd like. This doesn't mean we hate you, it
just means we want you to work with an editor.
If we like your judgement we may also grant you the
Editor privilege. Editors can approve stories for
publication and can edit or delete a story that's already
been posted, and individual comments as well.
What About Money?
Currently, this site costs Perens LLC $500/month to operate,
and that's coming right out of Bruce Perens' pocket. Whatever
advertising we run doesn't begin to offset our costs.
Eventually, we may become profitable - who knows? Our intent
is always to do the right thing by our contributors - if you
feel our policies aren't doing that, please write.
Rad. I knew there was a reason I keep coming back.
Thanks for the site. It truely is a boon to have. I check the RSS several times daily, as I check thru the other news sites I comb thru (/., arstechnica, blue'snews, etc). Technocrat appeals to my activist-geek side very well.
Thanks for the site, Bruce. In a wasteland of net news, I can always find a gem on the techocrat front page.
> You retain the copyright on anything you write here, and can do what you wish with it. > You grant to Perens LLC a separate and independent copyright on the same work.
I think that what you want to say here is "You grant Perens LLC a nonexclusive license for the work". "Seperate and independent copyright on the same work" makes no sense.
What do you plan to do with the material for which you need an explicit license?
It really is valid for two parties to hold a separate and independent copyright on separate instances of the same work. I've been using this for a very long time in cases where I wanted to grant someone else all rights and also keep them for myself.
It allows either party to choose what license it will grant to others each time it makes that grant.
The reason I am asking for this rather than a particular license is that free text licenses are in flux, and I would like to have the option to go with a new one.
Yes, thanks a lot for this site and funding its continued existence, your willingness to make articles longer and more technical in nature, while also avoiding the needless paranoia and fanboyism that is rampant on sites like Slashdot is a refreshing change. I hope that as it grows more popular it keeps true to these roots while only becoming more active.
I'd also like to add a simple "Hey, thanks." here Bruce. $500/mo is a significant check to write month after month. I appreciate it and also hope the site grows.
On this- I'd support the addition of a "Donate here" paypal button to the site's CSS. Heck, if I can find a few spare dollars, I'd go ahead and throw some money into keeping editors like Zogger employed.
That's seconded here - I'd gladly stick some dollars in the pot, as I'm sure a lot of the other users would.
I can imagine the advertising revenue has been low given the campaigns I've seen running - predominately "new emoticons for your e-mail" which I will not touch with a 7000ft bargepole.
Yes, we gave up the ad service that was sending us the emoticon ads. It didn't really fit the site.
Rather than send money, at this time I'd prefer well-crafted news postings. To achieve the goals of the site, we need to build up readership, and that will not happen unless folks like you are doing some writing from time to time.
Managing Our World - Ecology, epidemic disease, and potentials for widespread disaster go here. There are areas where technologists best understand the threat and should take a leading role.
I'd just like to point out that taking a leading role *does* require getting involved in politics- which can also mean pointing out the stupidity of the current non-technical politicans where appropriate.
Many of us enjoy these things, but they don't belong here: sports (including Amateur Radio contesting that doesn't have a public-service or emergency orientation), gaming, television, science fiction, product press releases from vendors, pseudoscience (we have to improve our pseudoscience filter).
Agreeed- except on product press releases from vendors. Unless vendors is limited to retail resellers, I personally think product press releases from manufacturers are very interesting- but the part that should be quoted here is the part that contains the specifications of the product.
First - Thanks. Technocrat is an excellent site that is a pleasure to visit on a daily basis. I hope that someday soon it will break even or make Bruce rich beyond his wildest dreams (although if he has $500 a month to twiddle away he must already be there).
Technocrat's intentions - Until now, I had no idea that one of the major intentions was that Technocrat should be a "technology legal policy" site. Before today (unless I missed it), there was no FAQ, mission statement or about page to provide an answer other then the title. Was it intentional to start a "tech" site and see where it led? How long has Technocrat been in existence? This isn't a "pre-filter" for Slashdot is it (sorry, it's the conspiracy theorist in me)?
Speaking of Slashdot - As far as I can remember, Slashdot was my introduction to this type of information dispersal and I loved it. Maybe back then, their site was (relatively) new, but the freshness has worn off since then although I still visit daily. Maybe the tolerance of Anonymous Cowards hampers the site. My guess, however, is that the decay of Slashdot into a "culture site" is related to volume of subscribers and visitors. If Technocrat served the amount of people that Slashdot does would the S/N ratio dwindle to an unacceptable level? I assume that anything "popular" eventually gets dragged, kicking and screaming, into directions unforeseen, but If Technocrat eventually gains popularity and readership will it be able to scale and maintain focus?
Smart? Prove it! - A "sand box" page off to the side of the main page for subscribers to hash out ideas and ask tech related questions might prove useful and interesting in such a focused community. Sure, it's just an idea that might shift focus, but that's probably why I'm flinging suggestions rather than running the site.
Product releases - Sure, an op-amp with 5% faster rise-time is ho-hum. However, what if Moller actually started producing their M400 skycar in volume? Where might Technocrat draw the line between a product release and "breaking news?"
Pseudoscience filter - The line between science and pseudoscience is paper (electron?) thin. Too often, it's thin enough to be moved by the legal policy the Technocrat is set to discuss. Technology emerging from third world countries or presented with jargon unfamiliar to field of discussion could be overlooked. Although it's sensible to "filter" articles to keep the S/N ratio reasonable and reduce the stress on the editors, a "junk bin" page containing articles the fall just below the "standards" of reason might be useful to allow readers to come to their own conclusion.
Statistics - Technology exists to serve people, but what do people want? The only way to know is to keep useful metrics and Technocrat has an excellent opportunity to collect and share those numbers. For example how many articles were posted today (correlation between current events)? How many of those articles were rejected (is Technocrat shifting)? What is the hottest topic in Technocrats history? What (relevant) words are people most likely use in posts? I've often wished that focus sites like this would publish those statistics (in s snappy charts and graphs) although I've wondered if those (anonymous) numbers are eventually sold to advertising agencies and the like.
In case the sentiment was lost in all the babble, thanks again.
Technocrat's intentions - Until now, I had no idea that one of the major intentions was that Technocrat should be a "technology legal policy" site. Before today (unless I missed it), there was no FAQ, mission statement or about page to provide an answer other then the title. Was it intentional to start a "tech" site and see where it led? How long has Technocrat been in existence? This isn't a "pre-filter" for Slashdot is it (sorry, it's the conspiracy theorist in me)?
We had more of a community for some time in 1999-2000. After a while postings died off, and I had been hired by HP and had a new baby and wasn't able to continue with the site. I brought it back a while ago and tried to get it "over the hump", and I'm still trying. I actually lost the domain for a few months, and two people kindly rescued it for me.
As far as I can remember, the first postings I made on the original site were in the same theme I'm promoting today. They even had a sort of bibliography at the end so that you could get into the issue in greater depth.
This is the first time that the site is actually running my own software, and I feel that I'm in control and can extend/modify it. The Squishdot site was a dead end (if you ask me, Zope is a dead end too, but others might feel strongly about that). The Slash internals weren't something I wanted to learn enough to be able to hack it. Ug-ly. The current Ruby on Rails code is much nicer than either one.
This isn't a "pre-filter" for Slashdot is it (sorry, it's the conspiracy theorist in me)?
Well, I - and my causes - seem to have become anathema with the more recent crop of Slashdot editors, after being their highest moderated poster for years and IMO drawing a lot of people and reputation their way. We're certainly not associated with them.
My guess, however, is that the decay of Slashdot into a "culture site" is related to volume of subscribers and visitors. If Technocrat served the amount of people that Slashdot does would the S/N ratio dwindle to an unacceptable level? I assume that anything "popular" eventually gets dragged, kicking and screaming, into directions unforeseen, but If Technocrat eventually gains popularity and readership will it be able to scale and maintain focus?
A lot of young musicians tell us how they'll never sell out when they get big, and we don't have to worry about this because they never get big. Certainly I have plans on how to handle it, who knows if they will ever be realized. One problem that Slashdot has is they actually have to do "defensive postings" because so many people bombard them with a particular story. I would use another mechanism to handle that.
Smart? Prove it! - A "sand box" page off to the side of the main page for subscribers to hash out ideas and ask tech related questions might prove useful and interesting in such a focused community. Sure, it's just an idea that might shift focus, but that's probably why I'm flinging suggestions rather than running the site.
You could really start this in an article. A sand-box would be more useful were there a surplus of main-page items.
Product releases - Sure, an op-amp with 5% faster rise-time is ho-hum. However, what if Moller actually started producing their M400 skycar in volume? Where might Technocrat draw the line between a product release and "breaking news?"
I would ask that you apply a self-servingness filter. If a product press release feels more self-serving than news-worthy, don't bother posting it.
For example how many articles were posted today (correlation between current events)? How many of those articles were rejected (is Technocrat shifting)?
We can do this once the numbers get more significant. Today, it's moot because we ran everything that was posted.
A sand box would be great. There are some recent long, rambling front page postings that really should have had extensive editing before being placed there. Some of these amount to little more than poorly reasoned and poorly informed rants. They do not have the quality that I expect from Technocrat. Maybe a little humility would be nice when an author is posting his/her rants - it would go down a lot easier.
A Kuroshin-like sand box where comments by critical readers can be made before the article is posted to the front page was not previously needed but I think now it's a fantastic idea for Technocrat. And, thanks Bruce for bringing us Technocrat!
I go to slashdot or fark to waste time. I come here to think and learn, something I enjoy immensely.
Bruce, I love what you're doing. And while I wouldn't pay a plug nickel to thse guys at Andover, I'd be happy to pay a subscription here, as I do with National Geographic, Scientific American, and the American Online Pilots Association. I'm a busy guy, so coming up with content is just something I'm never going to to do much of.
Content is something I come HERE for!
Well done on becoming one of my very favorite sites! Keep up the good work!
Technocrat.net's Raison D’être And How To Write for Us
Here are some notes on how to write news postings for Technocrat.net, and why Technocrat.net is here.
Raison d’être
First, what are we here for? That determines what sort of postings we're interested in.
Technocrat.net's raison d’être is to empower individuals to have control over technology, and to empower technological people to involve themselves in the formation of technology policy. The alternative would be to have technology, a tremendous force in our lives, owned and spoon-fed to us by large companies that control it exclusively - and to an increasing extent, control us as well.
Scientists, engineers, and programmers understand technology better than the people who are generally promoting and making laws around technology. We are best aware of both the benefits and the pitfalls. Without our participation, the general public will be led to accept things that aren't good for democracy and the world. Technocrat.net helps us learn more about these issues and the politics around them, and helps us put that knowledge to work.
Who Are We?
We are literally the smartest individuals in technology.
To create a venue for such bright lights, we don't "dumb down" articles for the general audience, and we maintain a high intellectual level in discussion. But nor do we obfuscate or make articles more difficult to read than necessary. In order to draw people in who should do a little work to understand the news our article titles are written to be accessible to most people, and then they can stretch themselves a bit once they're here. If someone has to look up "obfuscate" once they're reading an article, we try to make that easy for them.
Where Do We Come From?
Our heritage is in other movements that empowered the individual to understand and have power over technology. The chief of these is the Free Software / Open Source movement, but there are other similar movements like Amateur Radio and the general tendency of smart people to tinker.
Slashdot
Another of our roots is a similar site called Slashdot.org . Slashdot played a formative role as the community voice of Open Source / Free Software during a time of tremendous growth in that community. Unfortunately, Slashdot has more recently abdicated that role to become, in the words of its editors, "a geek culture site". We recognise the lure of the mass-market. As we write this, Slashdot is within the top 300 sites on the web by readership, and we congratulate them. But the serious work is going to need to go on elsewhere. We're taking up that flag.
Another issue with Slashdot is immaturity. It's rife with trolls and other detriments to the signal-to-noise ratio. We start out on a path to improve the level of discussion over that in Slashdot by eschewing the "Anonymous Coward" who is rampant there. If you don't want to take responsibility for your words, they don't belong here. We encourage you to put your full name in your login, and participate in all discussion as a known individual. We will take other measures to maintain the highest possible quality of discussion as they become necessary.
Writing for Technocrat.net
Obviously, the site won't go anywhere without content, and we need your help with that.
What's Interesting
There are four main categories of news that we're interested in:
What's Not Interesting
Many of us enjoy these things, but they don't belong here: sports (including Amateur Radio contesting that doesn't have a public-service or emergency orientation), gaming, television, science fiction, product press releases from vendors, pseudoscience (we have to improve our pseudoscience filter).
Posting
There are essentially two sorts of postings: one that points to an article on another site, and one containing an entire article.
If you see - or write - an article that should interest our audience, post it here using the "Submit Story" link on the left. The reward is that you help to inform an entire community. The risk is that we won't approve your post. Sorry if that happens, please don't take it too hard. If it's a post pointing to a story elsewhere, hopefully it hasn't taken much of your time. If it's a post containing your own material, you're free to take it elsewhere (actually, you're free to do that even if we do accept it).
Copyright
Unless we negotiate some other agreement: You retain the copyright on anything you write here, and can do what you wish with it. You grant to Perens LLC a separate and independent copyright on the same work. Either of us can do what we wish with it. We may use that copyright to make your work available to others under a "Free" license.
Other People's Copyrights
Don't infringe upon other people's copyrights. That means, don't just cut and paste a story from another venue here unless that story is a press release (which is meant to be republished) or bears licensing that permits republishing. If the story has a license that allows republication and you don't own it, note both the copyright holder and the license in your story, so that we won't think that you have granted us rights upon the story, and so that we won't violate the license.
Be Fair With Attribution
If you got something elsewhere, say so and give them credit by linking back to the original piece. If you don't attribute something, we will assume you wrote it.
Length
The "preface", the part of the story that appears in our front page, should be one or two paragraphs. The rest of the story (if any) should be in the "body" portion and may be as long as you like.
Style
Write in an "inverted pyramid" style. That means that the most important fact goes in the first sentence, then the second most important fact, and so on followed by facts of progressively diminishing importance. This allows the reader to get the most from any story without necessarily reading the entire story. When the facts reach a level that isn't important for that particular reader, that reader will click the "next" button.
Links
Include links, making it as easy as possible for the user to access the interesting parts of the story. It's OK for the links to be in the preface. We're more interested in informing the reader than having them click-through to the story page on our site and see another ad.
Provoke Discussion
Ask a question in your story, to provoke discussion. Participation will add value to the story.
How Stories Are Published
If you have not been granted Author privilege on this site, a posting you write will be stored for one of our editors to review it. The editor will decide whether to publish or delete your posting. If you have the Author privilege, a story will appear on the front page as soon as you submit it. If you've written a few stories for us successfully and want the Author privilege, please ask. We will grant it or not depending on how well we feel you can judge your own work according to our editorial parameters. This is not the easiest thing to do, and sometimes we'll gently ask you to keep working with the editors. We can also remove the Author privilege arbitrarily - generally because you've not judged your own work as well as we'd like. This doesn't mean we hate you, it just means we want you to work with an editor.
If we like your judgement we may also grant you the Editor privilege. Editors can approve stories for publication and can edit or delete a story that's already been posted, and individual comments as well.
What About Money?
Currently, this site costs Perens LLC $500/month to operate, and that's coming right out of Bruce Perens' pocket. Whatever advertising we run doesn't begin to offset our costs. Eventually, we may become profitable - who knows? Our intent is always to do the right thing by our contributors - if you feel our policies aren't doing that, please write.