How did the Wikipedia article about wrestler
Chris Benoit get updated with news of his wife's death
fourteen hours before the bodies of his family were discovered?
From the article:
The phrase "stemming from the death of his wife
Nancy" was added to the English Wikipedia's
"Chris Benoit" article at 12:01 a.m. EDT on June 25,
whereas the Fayette County police reportedly discovered the
bodies of the Benoit family at 2:30 p.m. EDT (14 hours, 29
minutes later). The IP address of the editor was traced to
Stamford, Connecticut, which is also the location of WWE
headquarters.
Whether this means anything or not largely depends on how good
the clocks are at Wikipedia and if their
logs are accurate and tamper-proof. As computers become more
integrated with society, the accuracy of the information they
tell us has to be very high if it's to be used in the
criminal justice system. Also in the news today is
a story about a pedophilia sting where charges were dropped
because the sting was poorly conducted by amateurs who can't
guarantee the accuracy and completeness of their logs.
It looks like WWE has been doing extensive editing and updating of this guy's profile in Wikipedia. There's lots of fako drama about feuds with other wrestlers and lots of serious discussion about his matches and his wrestling moves such as the "spinebuster pinfall" and the "crippler crossface". He could have called in to headquarters with some story about his wife dying and they put it up on Wikipedia while meanwhile he killed himself. Wikipedia says the deaths were at least a day apart.
Perhaps Wikipedia's terms of use should include a provision that either the editor is not being paid to do the edits, or if they are they should have to say so.
Looking at that report on the botched pedophile sting, I'm more concerned by news companies manufacturing news in concert with the police than I am about log accuracy. Manufacturing news just seems wrong on so many levels whereas logs and log accuracy is mostly a technical issue (though I have my doubts if they should be treated as little more than hearsay).
One other thing about that botched sting - the group of amateurs helping NBC and the police were called "Perverted Justice", which seems surprisingly apt.
over time they get refined, it's the "thousands of eyeballs" thing. for pop culture events in the last couple days who even really cares? I find wikipedia very useful for serious topics and have done some correcting and writing there myself, there is more in-depth knowledge there on many topics than normal encyclopedia provides (compare a general article on computers with wikipedia's model-specific articles including specs, instruction set, etc.)
Wikipedia at Center of Murder Mystery
How did the Wikipedia article about wrestler Chris Benoit get updated with news of his wife's death fourteen hours before the bodies of his family were discovered?
From the article:
Whether this means anything or not largely depends on how good the clocks are at Wikipedia and if their logs are accurate and tamper-proof. As computers become more integrated with society, the accuracy of the information they tell us has to be very high if it's to be used in the criminal justice system. Also in the news today is a story about a pedophilia sting where charges were dropped because the sting was poorly conducted by amateurs who can't guarantee the accuracy and completeness of their logs.