On Long Island, New York, where I learned to drive around 1976,
the pattern of making a left turn was to enter the intersection,
pass through the entire intersection on the right, and make a
left turn once you'd entered the appropriate lane. If two
cars were making left turns opposite each other, they'd pass
on each other's left. Intersections were often built with
islands in the middle, either made of concrete or just painted
orange circles, to enforce the proper way to pass through.
In California, vehicles generally start the left turn as they
enter the intersection, and two vehicles making left turns from
opposite each other will pass each other on the right.
They don't generally put circles in the middle of the
intersection here.
I think the New York way was better at preventing head-on
collisions. I wonder why they don't use it in California?
Remember that we drive on the right in North America.
Roundabouts, traffic circles with a large island in the center,
which enforce a circular pattern - right turn in, right turn out,
are rare here. When used properly, they make traffic lights less
necessary, although I have no idea if they actually make traffic
any faster. There's one big roundabout in Berkeley that is
usually a madhouse, because people don't know how to handle
it.
I guess if the car coming the opposite direction with their
blinker on were to change their mind or wasn't really
intending to turn you wouldn't pull right out in front of
them but would wait until they passed before making your turn?
And what would you do if the left turn lanes are directly
opposite each other like is pretty much standard everywhere?
I used to have this opinion as well. After a couple of
weeks of driving in England, I changed my mind. Roundabouts
seems to work rather well, once you get the hang of them.
I'm guessing you've never had to drive 70+ feet of truck
around one with your front tire rubbing on the outside curb and
your trailer tires up in the landscaping on the inside
circle...in traffic.
No, I had some wind-up toy that the Brits called
"mid-sized". When I told the guy at the rental
counter I could fit it in the trunk of my "mid-sized"
car at home, he just smiled and said something about "crazy
Americans".
Small diameter roundabouts are evil as you have to look in all
directions at once. We have lots of them here in Sydney. My
theory is that they work by creating enough confusion that
everyone gets scared and slows down, or stops, to give themselves
a chance to work out what everyone else is doing. You all do a
Mexican standoff, then someone makes a decision to go for it.
Hopefully not everyone decides at the same time.
Large roundabouts can work well since they reduce the
intersection to a simple "look right" (or left for the
US). In this context "large" means large enough that
the traffic flow for each entry/exit does not interact with its
neighbour.
Each driver seems to have their own theory on how indicators work
in roundabouts. For a four way intersection with a small
roundabout, the law here says indicate left if going left, right
if going right or nothing if going through. For a large
roundabout though, one is turning left into it and left out of
it, thus you indicate left on entry and exit. The law doesn't
say where the cross over is between large and small. Consequently
people just make it up. In practise it's not that bit a deal
though. It just adds to the existing sense of confusion and is
dealt with be people adding another level to their
alertness/caution.
Having said all of that, even a small roundabout seems less evil
than the idea of having oncoming traffic flows crossing each
other in intersections. Surely the keep left/right rule should be
of highest precedence?
I've never seen anything more confusing than The
Magic Roundabout in Swindon. You can go round it overall in
the wrong direction, as long as you're going around the mini
ones that make up the large one the right way.
However, I think that roundabouts are fine.
I was surprised to learn that in some countries, you have to give
way to traffic entering the roundabout, which seems very stupid
to me. Keeping the roundabout flowing so it doesn't seize up
is the best solution.
Roundabouts work until you reach a certain density of traffic,
and then they become a great hinderance as one route through the
roundabout tends to 'hog' it, leaving no break in the
traffic for other people to enter.
But lighter-traffic (local neighbourhoods,etc), they're
cheaper than traffic lights and much quicker to transit through.
And if you're scrubbing the tyres on your 70ft truck going
through the roundabout, I respectfully suggest you try another
route. But most small roundabouts built here in Australia have a
smooth concrete lip on the inner circle that's wide enough to
allow trucks to pass through relatively unimpeded.
The state I live in seems to have gone all in for roundabouts. I
dislike them.
There was an article in our paper about this a couple months ago.
They have kept statistics on accidents at the intersections that
have been replaced. The number of accidents has increased, but
the number of serious ones (hospitalizations & fatalities)
has decreased. The main problem I have with them is that incoming
traffic does not yield to traffic in the circle as they should.
This results in more side-swipe type accidents, I guess. In the
traditional intersections, people blow through the stop sign/red
light & there are more high speed T-bones.
To be somewhat cynical, i suspect that the lack of a large island
makes the roads cheaper to build as they take up less real
estate. Wouldnt surprise me at all if something like this were
the case ...
If I understand, the paths of the cars would cross one
another. If that is the case, then if there is a line of
cars, they will have to stop and mak way for one another.
The "pass on the left" method seems like it would keep
things moving better in congested situations.
What I dont understand is why roadway designers seem to prefer to
use traffic signals when freeways intersect these days.
Within the last couple years an intersection was done near my
house. One of the freeways passes over the other, but
instead of cloverleafing, they put in signals.
Starting the turn immediately means that the paths of two cars
going opposite directions and making left turns don't cross.
Sufficiently busy intersections here in Memphis TN generally give
left-turn-arrow for both directions of a road at the same time,
then go-straight for each direction when out of left-turn cars
for the other direction, or after a timeout.
N, S: Left Turn; E, W: Stop
(no more cars turning left on the N side)
S: Left Turn, Straight; E, W, N: Stop
(timer expires)
N, S: Straight; E, W: Stop
...
N, S, E, W: Stop (for maybe a second)
E, W: Left Turn; N, S: Stop
...
I think the New York way was better at preventing head-on
collisions. I wonder why they don't use it in California?
Avoiding a head-on collision only requires that people follow the
curved lines that are sometimes visibly painted on the
intersection. Avoiding side-on collisions in the NY model sounds
like it would additionally require checking for oncoming traffic,
the same as making a left-turn on green without the special
left-turn light.
hah, that article mentions Palentine Road somewhat south of me,
which is a kooky aberration here in the midwest; I've
lived here four years and I'm still trying to decide if I
like it, think it would be better without the concrete seperator
but then people not used to it would do even crazier apeshit
confused manuevers.
And I thought it was horrid when ODOT did the thankfully
temporary Canyon Rd LEFT LANE exit off of Hwy 26.
Speaking of ODOT- I don't have time today, but the check is
in the bank, and I'll be writing a full confession/expose on
what I think went wrong soon. It's long and complex, and
I'm not sure if it belongs here or in my slashdot journal.
Though an argument for it being here is one of the
conclusions is that I was running into a clash of cultures where
one generation felt that government employees are automatons who
need to keep government secrets and "stay on message"
as a unit, vs another younger culture in which government should
not keep secrets, government employees are human beings with full
rights, and that we get better government when such people are
fully engaged in the culture they are serving.
Bet you can guess who had most of the power in my case.
Roundabouts are becoming more common, at least here in Kansas.
There is on in downtown Wichita, one just off I-135 in Newton,
and one going on on the intersection of US-400 and K66 (old Route
66) just outside of Riverton.
The larger ones are really nice as a non-blocking intersection.
The smaller ones are just confusing.
That said, I'd like to ask any left-side-of-the-road types
out there: is it as unnatural for you to enter a right-side
roundabout as it is for me (who has been driving since 14, on the
right) to enter a left-side roundabout?
Well I drive in England, but my parents also have a house in
France so I get plenty of practice at both left hand side and
right hand side driving in both left hand and right hand drive
cars and my motorbike as wel; so I can claim to have driven every
combination that exists (they occasionally bring their French car
back to England, and I have driven my car in France on several
occasions)
In a word, no. It's very easy to swap between the two types
of roundabouts as you swap sides of the road. Since you're on
the right, I find now looking to the left becomes automatic in a
matter of seconds. Equally as soon as I get back to England
you're very obviously on the left so looking to the right
jumps right back in.
Except of course for a few of the older style french roundabouts
where traffic on the roundabout gives way to traffic entering the
roundabout - which takes some getting used to and can cause some
interesting moments if you haven't realised the roundabout
you're on is the old variety...
Midway between the two examples, Detroit has many
median-separated roads. To turn left there, one turns right
and then executes essentially a U-turn through a median break
halfway to the next intersection. That took a while to get
used to.
Timothy basically has it correct. If you use the old 'pass on
the left' path, left turn paths in opposing directions cross.
What can happen is lines of left turn vehicles in opposing
directions can block each others path and end up with grid-lock
in the middle of the intersection, with no one able to move
because a car is in their way.
It is also highly dependent on the layout of the intersection. In
New York there are a lot of relatively narrow streets, where
turning into them the pass-left path makes sense. In California
there are a lot more 6 lane-6 lane intersections, with a lot of
open space in the middle of the intersection for passing on the
right. In a heavily congested turn, the engineer may want to have
dual-left turn lanes, and that only works in pass-right
configurations.
The thing is that, while pass-left follows the normal rules of
the road, at left turns it really is generally more efficient to
have everyone pass-right, but it is incredibly hard to convey
that in an 'official' manner to the general public
without causing tremendous confusion and upset.
In addition, I'll say that head-on, left-on-left collisions
are extremely rare. Generally the speeds are low enough, and
people are focusing on opposing traffic that at worst, there is a
nose-to-nose confrontation where someone has to back off, but in
19 years of traffic engineering I've probably only seen an
issue with it very few times and only at specific intersections
with a poor layout. Pass-right can be more uncomfortable for the
drivers, and in a permissive left situation the opposing left
vehicles can block the view of on-coming through vehicles, so
that is also a consideration we have when doing intersection
design.
A lot of comments are in favor of large traffic circles, not
small ones. In my experience, small roundabouts work great
at intersections of two lane (a single lane in each direction)
roads.
I find traffic circles with two or more lanes going around to be
confusing and dangerous. There is a two-laner in Towson,
Maryland that is atrocious in terms of safety, especially since
there are a lot of pedestrians in the area. The right of
way of the inner lane crosses the outer lane. If you are in
the outer lane, you may be required to turn right
immediately, but motorists who are not familiar with the rules
will make mistakes. The rules still are not clear to me.
Our city had one intersection,
Stone street and Pine Grove Ave that historically did left
turns like that, Pine Grove crosses the intersection at a 45
degree angle So it was more nature to turn that way; the state
finally came in and redesigned the intersection with lines and
delayed each side so people wouldn't do it that way anymore.
we had a lot of accidents from out of towners there. Ever see a
Michigan left? Two divided Highways that intersect here normally
do a Michigan left, to turn left you turn right, then do a U turn
through the median.
Left Turn Patterns for Automobile Traffic
On Long Island, New York, where I learned to drive around 1976, the pattern of making a left turn was to enter the intersection, pass through the entire intersection on the right, and make a left turn once you'd entered the appropriate lane. If two cars were making left turns opposite each other, they'd pass on each other's left. Intersections were often built with islands in the middle, either made of concrete or just painted orange circles, to enforce the proper way to pass through.
In California, vehicles generally start the left turn as they enter the intersection, and two vehicles making left turns from opposite each other will pass each other on the right. They don't generally put circles in the middle of the intersection here.
I think the New York way was better at preventing head-on collisions. I wonder why they don't use it in California?
Remember that we drive on the right in North America.
Roundabouts, traffic circles with a large island in the center, which enforce a circular pattern - right turn in, right turn out, are rare here. When used properly, they make traffic lights less necessary, although I have no idea if they actually make traffic any faster. There's one big roundabout in Berkeley that is usually a madhouse, because people don't know how to handle it.