In the western world and Japan, the population is aging, meaning
among other things that the drivers are getting older. One
problem-a lot of the engineers designing new cars are not
"older" and they have no practical frame of reference
what it is like trying to drive then. Enter the aging
suit, a device developed by Nissan that they make young
engineers put on that simulates everything from arthritis to
cataracts to a more..ample....middle, so that they can have some
idea on the real world implications of their designs.
With the 65 and older population in the U.S. expected to
double to 70 million - one in five people - by 2030, Nissan Motor
Co. and other automakers are looking at safety and comfort design
changes as a way to reach for baby boomers' wallets.
ed.z.: Bah! This isn't rocket surgery, there's an easy
fix to make a geezer mobile! Just make every button or lever on
or about the dash operate either the horn or the high
beams..problem solved!
Good idea! I am only 34, but I can already anticipate the
future benefits. I took 3 years off from biking, only to
find that my left knee wasn't too happy with my efforts to
get back in shape. It's even effecting my hypermiling
efforts, as I have to minimize how often I pop the clutch!
On top of that, I have always had a terrible short term
memory, and I'm terrible at multitasking. I try not to
extrapolate to my later years.
That is OK, but they would still need to do something like this
for the people who actually generate the designs. One real
experience trumps all feedback.
I'm sorry, but if you cannot turn the steering wheel or press
the pedals vigorously because you have arthritis or you cannot
see something in the car because you have cataracts, you should
not be driving.
If you are so dependent on the power steering and power braking
that you are unable to turn or stop if your engine dies at
freeway speed, you should not be driving.
That's a matter of degree. Making the dashboard with better
visibility for the gauges, making so the knobs work easily,
making it so it is easier to get in and out of the vehicle,etc is
not a huge problem as long as it is addressed. Designing all
consumer things so only people in their 20s and 30s can use them
is rather much an eugenics approach. As in.. be prepared to enter
the disintegration chamber once you have outlived the
Fatherland's "useful young consumer" phase of
existence. You really want to go that direction? Or accept
reality that as you get older some times you need a little help
to cope.
Like what's wrong with handrails? A lot of people can get by
without them climbing stairs, but it helps as you get older. But
should we eliminate them and say they are useless and a waste
because some people don't need them at some point during
their life, and everyone else should just stop walking places
that involve using stairs, use that as a criteria? Or ramps so
folks in wheelchairs can get about, heck with it, if they
can't walk and climb a curb, they should just stay home? How
far do you want to go with this "only perfectly functioning
young humans may access the outside world" deal?
I like to bump default font sizes up a little just so I can see
the screen, so I shouldn't be able to use the computer unless
I can get by with tiny fonts that younger folks can see easily?
And this saying "public transportation" to get
*exactly* to what we are talking about, is simply impractical,
borderline nonsensical in the US, we don't all live in big
cities where there is a modicum of public transportation, nor
could we all, nor could society afford it to change
that way, and once you hit the exurbs and beyond, "public
transportation" doesn't exist for most practical
purposes beyond the odd greyhound bus and some meals on wheels
action, and we don't have an extra several dozen trillion to
build and operate a universal public transportation sector
besides what we already have, which is called roads. And that
means cars and back to the article.
And maybe that is something the automakers will address, perhaps
a graceful degradation between full power everything and it not
working. I know once in my old full sized van I lost power
steering, OK on the highway, rather a PITA even as a strong dude
in the city if that happens unexpectedly, a lot of people
probably couldn't have handled it in an emergency reaction
circumstance, young folks or not. Stuff like that *needs* to be
worked on by these automakers, and it looks like they are.
How about if you are perfectly capable of getting the car pulled
over and stopped should the engine fail but driving for an hour
or 2 without good power steering and brakes leaves you aching and
tired? Perhaps you are perfectly capable of spotting the cars
20-100 feet away, but the tiny print on the dash controls is a
bit fuzzy without reading glasses (which you should NOT be
wearing while driving).
Wouldn't you rather that those people (who are perfectly
capable of driving) be able to quickly make out the controls so
they don't fumble with them while driving? Don't you want
them to be at their best rather than distracted by joint aches
and fatigue?
This is not about allowing people to drive when they're
otherwise too frail to contemplate it, it's about allowing
those who are perfectly capable of driving but older to do so
more easily and safely.
I'm not there yet, but it's unrealistic to believe I
never will be. That honest realization doesn't even begin to
really occur to people until they reach middle age.
Where I live, the nearest public transportation is 4 miles away.
People here WILL drive. It's better to make it easy for them.
Engineering for Older Drivers
In the western world and Japan, the population is aging, meaning among other things that the drivers are getting older. One problem-a lot of the engineers designing new cars are not "older" and they have no practical frame of reference what it is like trying to drive then. Enter the aging suit, a device developed by Nissan that they make young engineers put on that simulates everything from arthritis to cataracts to a more..ample....middle, so that they can have some idea on the real world implications of their designs.
With the 65 and older population in the U.S. expected to double to 70 million - one in five people - by 2030, Nissan Motor Co. and other automakers are looking at safety and comfort design changes as a way to reach for baby boomers' wallets. ed.z.: Bah! This isn't rocket surgery, there's an easy fix to make a geezer mobile! Just make every button or lever on or about the dash operate either the horn or the high beams..problem solved!