What, no more AC rants and trolling and flaming? That is sort of
the goal when it comes to proposed South
Korean internet rules.
The rules extend beyond websites to individuals. All forum and
chatroom users will be required to make verifiable real-name
registrations, while internet companies will have to make their
search algorithms public to improve "transparency".
Most controversial of all, the commission will be given powers to
suspend the publication of articles accused of being fraudulent
or slanderous, for a minimum of 30 days. During this period the
commission will then decide if an article that has been been
temporarily deleted or flagged should be removed permanently.
ed.z.: *snort* this falls into the "good luck with
that!" territory
<preaching to the choir> At least among those who have a
remote clue about the Internet? Who decides what constitutes
"nice" across all cultures or is Korea the only one
that counts? The Internet doesn't have borders.
Non-anonymous speech isn't free speech, just ask
"Publius", author of the Federalist Papers. Silly
dreamer me, though, in much of the world, free speech is just a
dream. </preaching to the choir>
Korea in Push to Enact Net "Niceness" Rules
What, no more AC rants and trolling and flaming? That is sort of the goal when it comes to proposed South Korean internet rules.
The rules extend beyond websites to individuals. All forum and chatroom users will be required to make verifiable real-name registrations, while internet companies will have to make their search algorithms public to improve "transparency". Most controversial of all, the commission will be given powers to suspend the publication of articles accused of being fraudulent or slanderous, for a minimum of 30 days. During this period the commission will then decide if an article that has been been temporarily deleted or flagged should be removed permanently. ed.z.: *snort* this falls into the "good luck with that!" territory