News today about the ongoing investigation into the incident on 7
October 2008 when a Qantas A330-300 made two uncommanded changes
in altitude. Fourteen people were seriously injured in the
incident. A preliminary report by the Australian Air Transport
Safety Bureau is looking into the possibility that a Navy
communications transmitter at Exmouth in Western Australia
could have interfered with systems on board the aircraft.
MS: About a year ago I was on a flight to Malaysia. The guy
next to me started his phone when the crew secured for landing
and was reading his new emails as we touched down. I suppose the
rules don't apply to him.
Investigators currently speculate and build models to investigate
the EMR affects on aircraft. I think it might be time to equip
aircraft with recording devices specific for electromagnetic
radiation. Until then there will be a lot of guesswork in this
kind of investigation.
And this is why I will never trust those commercial airliners -
they are flying death traps, I tell yeh! Going all 400 miles per
hour so high that you'd suffocate if you had to breath the
air up there at 7-8 miles above sea level! How could this be
considered "safe"? If even the slightest thing goes
wrong, everybody aboard is a dead man!
So when I fly, I fly in a Cessna! The electrical system can be
*turned* *off* while in flight with no effect on the engine or
flight controls! I adjust the fuel mixture by hand! I'm only
a few thousand feet above sea level! As the pilot, I'm
directly in control of just about everything. Obviously, this is
much safer, right?
Oops! Dead wrong, that is!
Commercial airlines have proven to be the safest means of common
travel - something like 1/10th the death rate per mile of travel
than a car, even when you include the deaths from 9/11. Small,
single-engine planes, on the otherhand, fall somewhere between a
car and a motorcycle in deaths per mile - not bad, but not
particularly great, either.
Yes, they'll do their investigation, they'll try to
identify WTF happened, but this doesn't change the fact that
commercial aviation, with all its hassles, taking off your shoes,
and standing in lines, is among the very safest and most
efficient forms of travel. A commercial airline transports you at
about 50 miles per gallon per passenger - not bad at over 300
knotts!
Don't get me wrong, I am not claiming that the sky is
falling.
Comercial aviation is safe because some people do take a paranoid
approach. As we clean up the old failure modes new ones will
become more important, with more overall safety, for sure.
Except for the fact that, just like in the argument over whether
cell phones cause brain cancer, there is far more high energy EMR
naturally in the environment, especially for planes at high
altitude, than a modern cell phone produces, even at max output.
If planes can fly through lightning storms without falling out of
the sky, you are going to be hard pressed to get me to believe
that even a hundred cell phones, all going at once, are going to
bring a plane down. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary
evidence.
Electromagnetic interference a growing problem in Aviation
News today about the ongoing investigation into the incident on 7 October 2008 when a Qantas A330-300 made two uncommanded changes in altitude. Fourteen people were seriously injured in the incident. A preliminary report by the Australian Air Transport Safety Bureau is looking into the possibility that a Navy communications transmitter at Exmouth in Western Australia could have interfered with systems on board the aircraft.
Investigators are also looking into the possibility that equipment operated by a passenger could have caused the problem.
Another article reports that an air data inertial reference unit generated spurious information throughout the flight and that the flight control system went into a degraded mode at the time of the incident as a result of this spurious input.
MS: About a year ago I was on a flight to Malaysia. The guy next to me started his phone when the crew secured for landing and was reading his new emails as we touched down. I suppose the rules don't apply to him.
Investigators currently speculate and build models to investigate the EMR affects on aircraft. I think it might be time to equip aircraft with recording devices specific for electromagnetic radiation. Until then there will be a lot of guesswork in this kind of investigation.