As long as the number 7 is up for discussion, the above figure is
what Bloomberg researchers came up with for the
true level of the bailouts and loans...so far.
When Congress approved the TARP on Oct. 3, Fed Chairman Ben S.
Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson acknowledged the
need for transparency and oversight. Now, as regulators commit
far more money while refusing to disclose loan recipients or
reveal the collateral they are taking in return, some Congress
members are calling for the Fed to be reined in. ed.z.: and a
lone voice from the Congressional wilderness cries out [Ron Paul]
"toldyaso"
And they refuse to say exactly where all the money is going.
*Refuse*. Some yes, but a lot, nope. And we haven't even
started on the new, New Deal yet with the upcoming
administration.
If you are a US citizen, you've now "invested" over
25 grand on bailouts (you might have received upto 600 bucks in
insta rebates for that expenditure though to make you feel better
about it). That's brand new babies on up, so if you have a
family, add it up.. Not sure how other folks think, but I
don't feel like I got 25 grand worth of service or products
so far for my "investment" in maintaining a whole lot
of someones else's upscale Manhattan-esque lifestyles and
cushy jobs just because I was threatened with having my economy
crashed if I didn't pay up, and fast. Of course, I realize
this is oblique, but those are real numbers to contemplate, along
with the "so far" part.
I think it would have been better if we had called their economic
terrorism bluff and had them explain from jail cells how the
economy was now going to crash, and exactly why again, in a bit
more detail with some more exact names/dates/places to further
clarify this "emergency" situation. We might be looking
at totally different headlines right now. It's like those
Somali pirates, pay them once, keep paying them, they will go for
more and bigger targets. Sink them and be done with it, no more
being heldup for ransom. IMO YMMV
Heh, heh, I had just linked that article in a reply for Thomas.
Don't forget that the estimates for the 2009 economic
stimulus program are an additional $700B - $1T in new spending.
We really can't build to the sky (expand the economy forever,
sooner or later everyone has your widget), and we really
can't borrow our way out of debt.
Back when FDR tried to bail everything out with the New Deal the
U.S. was the biggest creditor nation in the world. Other
countries owed money to us. Today we are the largest debtor
nation in the world. In fact, we owe more money than
every other nation combined.
From 1930-1933 the U.S. suffered deflation at a rate of 10% per
year. This time, if deflation happens, it means we would
essentially be defaulting on foreign-owned debt. If it
started to happen significantly, we'd be royally screwing
over China, Japan, the E.U. and others who own our debt as it
devalued in relation to the dollar.
As a reaction, it is quite possible they'd start calling in
our debt and our economy would be totally done for. Reset,
start over, the key is to bang the rocks together guys.
I thought deflation for creditors was a good thing. If you are in
debt, it's bad for you because you now must pay with money
that is more "dear" (worth more than it was), and one
of the downsides to deflation is that you make less (individually
and a country as a whole).
A lot of inflation is a bad thing for the person who made the
loan. If I loan someone $50, and then we have hyper inflation of
15% the year after, that $50 that he owes me is now worth 15%
less than it was a year before. Hopefully I when I loaned it to
him, I realized that the inflation was going to be high and so
charged him 21% interest on it :).
It would be good for us, if our creditors lets
us get away with it. That is a big "if". If
they realize that our debt is shrinking by deflation, they're
going to want to call it in ASAP to maximize THEIR return,
causing us to default.
$7.7T sure is a lot of money and Bloomberg numbers are probably spot on. The year 2009
is not looking good with retail companies yet to feel the real
affect of people not spending money. I think in 2009 we
will see a lot of companies world-wide go bust and unemployment
rise to record highs.
It is hoped that as far as the US is concerned that their new
administration will be able to turn things around but I think the
stable door has been opened far too long and the horse has
galloped too far into the distance. It will take a long time to
"come right".
This year I have put in a vegetable garden ( 40 years since the
last one) to help out family and myself. Falling bank
interest rates on invested money are going to make it hard to
survive on a pension for this old wrinkly.
Gardening is a great investment and heckuva lot of fun, past the
dreary drudge work of course. Once it is built and established
though it is more fun than not, and you can't beat the
commute or prices to the backyard supermarket. If you want to
venture into a little small scale meat production, try ducks
instead of chickens. I'm really impressed with the
differences we are seeing. I like the chickens, but the ducks
just do better, with the caveat it is a little harder to maintain
them if you include a pond for them to swim around in, they love
it. We just use a big tank and empty it out periodically. Dumb me
though, I need to reestablish where their pen is so it is
DOWNHILL to the garden instead of uphill, then I could use a
drain and drain that water into some growing beds. Anyway, they
grow faster, seem to tolerate weather extremes better, won't
tear the garden up like chickens and they give good eggs more
year round without needing the artificially extended daylight the
chickens need to keep laying (my chickens just started again
since I installed a little light in their coop with a timer). The
ducks have been laying right along though, no electric light
needed.
New program announced, the TALF. The Fed has crossed the
line into a dangerous amount of risky loans; if the economy
continues to contract over the next year and big banks fall, the
system goes with it.
And, due to the frequent meddling in the stock market by the US
government, it is nearly impossible to invest in it with any
confidence either.
The looming increases in inflation (if not hyperinfationary,
likely near-so) will almost certainly wipe out any gains earned
by conventional deposits on interest.
There are diminishing safe havens for saving and investment. Food
commodities (you gotta eat), money metals, etc.
We're putting in a garden, wood stove, solar/wind generation
-- hopefully all within the next six months. I won't say
"the end is nigh" quite yet, but that's no reason
not to be prepared.
Good for you! I feel like my sore fingers over the past year have
done some good then! The best investment people can do today is
in THEMSELVES and getting as independent as possible from the
rigged economy. We are all forced into playing, but we can
minimize the bad effects by acting proactively.
zogger, I'd be interested to talk with you more about your
set-up. We live on a little bit of land, with access to woods and
pasture. We're definitely intersted in becoming much more
self-sufficient.
You and many others on this board have been a source of
inspiration and no small amount of food for thought.
Feel free to contact me offline sometime at jeff.herron at gmail
dot com.
I'm confused by this talk of hyperinflation. Money is
being destroyed in the range of trillions a week. Stock
market, commodities, derivatives, real estate, etc. are all
tanking. That's text book deflation: a contraction in
the money supply.
Sure, the US government is pumping trillions so far into
"fixing" this problem. These trillions are debt
secured notes, which increases the money supply (i.e.,
inflation).
However, the wealth destruction is occurring far faster than the
government can keep up. When you combine the deflation of
the market and inflation by the US government, you end up with
net deflation of the dollar.
That's starting to play out in real prices. Look around
at retail prices, retail gasoline, or wholesale dry goods.
Prices are dropping.
That's scary. Since we owe a lot of money to other
countries in dollars, deflation will increase the real amount
that we owe them. Our debt is ballooning fast due to
deflation. Our attempts to stave off deflation through
issuing debt secured notes only adds to the problem by increasing
our nominal principal.
$7.7 Trillion
As long as the number 7 is up for discussion, the above figure is what Bloomberg researchers came up with for the true level of the bailouts and loans...so far.
When Congress approved the TARP on Oct. 3, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson acknowledged the need for transparency and oversight. Now, as regulators commit far more money while refusing to disclose loan recipients or reveal the collateral they are taking in return, some Congress members are calling for the Fed to be reined in. ed.z.: and a lone voice from the Congressional wilderness cries out [Ron Paul] "toldyaso"
And they refuse to say exactly where all the money is going. *Refuse*. Some yes, but a lot, nope. And we haven't even started on the new, New Deal yet with the upcoming administration.
If you are a US citizen, you've now "invested" over 25 grand on bailouts (you might have received upto 600 bucks in insta rebates for that expenditure though to make you feel better about it). That's brand new babies on up, so if you have a family, add it up.. Not sure how other folks think, but I don't feel like I got 25 grand worth of service or products so far for my "investment" in maintaining a whole lot of someones else's upscale Manhattan-esque lifestyles and cushy jobs just because I was threatened with having my economy crashed if I didn't pay up, and fast. Of course, I realize this is oblique, but those are real numbers to contemplate, along with the "so far" part.
I think it would have been better if we had called their economic terrorism bluff and had them explain from jail cells how the economy was now going to crash, and exactly why again, in a bit more detail with some more exact names/dates/places to further clarify this "emergency" situation. We might be looking at totally different headlines right now. It's like those Somali pirates, pay them once, keep paying them, they will go for more and bigger targets. Sink them and be done with it, no more being heldup for ransom. IMO YMMV