Some climate researchers-heavy in the global warming camp-are
making the case that it is already too late to do much of
anything about the long term effects of increased
atmospheric CO2. They say what we have now will lead to
greatly increased overall planetary warming and the effects could
last thousands of years, because the oceans are near saturation
point of how much more CO2 they can absorb.
But one of the main researchers - Professor David Archer of
Chicago University - warns that "the climatic impacts of
releasing fossil fuel carbon dioxide into the atmosphere will
last longer than Stonehenge, longer than time capsules, far
longer than the age of human civilisation so far. Ultimate
recovery takes place on timescales of hundreds of thousands of
years, a geologic longevity typically associated in public
perceptions with nuclear waste." ed.z.: well...gee.
Let's hope he is wrong. And with that said, this could
backfire, statements like that. If this gets wider public
dissemination, it could lead to something like this: "no
matter what we do now, we are still en-screwed for the next
zillion years, so heck with it, burn it all up!"
I agree that this could be a dangerous statement to make. Where
there is hope there is a way. Take away that hope and who will
bother to look for a way.
Scientists have said the oceans absorb a lot of CO2 for many
years but as yet the oceans have not "started to fizz"
because of too much CO2. I think it is only over recent
years that serious measurements of ocean absorption of CO2 have been taken
and I would be interested to know exactly how these measurements
are taken so they can confidently say the oceans have reached CO2
saturation point compared to when?
And with that said, this could backfire, statements like
that.
Well, it could do little worse than the last two decades'
verbatim replayed warnings that there's "only one decade
left." to change our ways, Or Else (tm).
Maybe some areas of scientific discourse are in a race with
journalism to the bottom of respectibility -- where emphasizing
shock value to attract eyeballs has become the s.o.p.
Already too late for CO2 levels?
Some climate researchers-heavy in the global warming camp-are making the case that it is already too late to do much of anything about the long term effects of increased atmospheric CO2. They say what we have now will lead to greatly increased overall planetary warming and the effects could last thousands of years, because the oceans are near saturation point of how much more CO2 they can absorb.
But one of the main researchers - Professor David Archer of Chicago University - warns that "the climatic impacts of releasing fossil fuel carbon dioxide into the atmosphere will last longer than Stonehenge, longer than time capsules, far longer than the age of human civilisation so far. Ultimate recovery takes place on timescales of hundreds of thousands of years, a geologic longevity typically associated in public perceptions with nuclear waste." ed.z.: well...gee. Let's hope he is wrong. And with that said, this could backfire, statements like that. If this gets wider public dissemination, it could lead to something like this: "no matter what we do now, we are still en-screwed for the next zillion years, so heck with it, burn it all up!"