An interesting survey
here about US High School students and ethics, stealing, cheating
on papers, etc. Apparently, there is a disconnect, a lot of
students in the anonymous survey admitted to stealing from stores
or even friends and parents, or cheating on tests, yet they
consider themselves to be highly ethical and "better
than" their friends when it comes to these issues.
ed.z.: Some pretty high numbers there. Would be interesting to
compare them to current adult levels on the same sort of
questions.
Am I stealing when I throw garbage into a garbage can that's
not mine?
Am I stealing when I throw a rock from a gravel road I don't
live on?
Am I stealing when I let my dog take a sip of water from an
irrigation ditch that's not my farm, when I'm out taking
a walk?
All of these examples can be easily considered a form of
stealing, yet few would think twice about doing any of them. The
reason is that the value of the item being "stolen" is
extremely low.
Stuff has become cheap enough that the average bloke doesn't
value it much. Put another way, we've become so wealthy that
people don't give a damn about wealth. At least, not like
they did historically.
See, 200 years ago, stuff was *precious*. A watch was a very
expensive item. And having things like watches and comfortable
leather shoes was itself a rarity. When you had stuff, you were
special somehow, because most of people's posessions were
self-made. Barrels were hand made. So were clothes. So were
houses, transportation, and gifts.
But with the rise of the factory age in the 19th century, stuff
became cheaper. And cheaper. And cheaper still. Year after year,
the relative cost of stuff dropped, the relative quality against
price rose, and stuff became less and less and less valuable.
Because economics teaches us, stuff has value in accordance with
its scarcity. We value what is scarce, we waste what is not.
Owning the only kazoo in the world makes your kazoo a rare
artifact and makes you rich. Owning a kazoo purchased in a bag of
a dozen at the local dollar store probably results in the kazoo
being thrown away within a day or so.
And this is true in all aspects of our lives. Rich people long
for free time and/or a cause to extinguish their boredom, poor
people want... stuff. Big house, big car, big TV, etc....
Does it surprise me now, when the average middle-class worker can
really afford to live like the kings of yore, that the average
person values stuff so little that they wouldn't think it
particularly unethical to lift a bit here and there?
Compare this concept to honesty and the "white lie".
(Oh, you look wonderful, dear!)
Am I stealing when I throw garbage into a garbage can
that's not mine?
I assume that you mean a substantial volume of garbage rather
than something like a cigarette butt or candy wrapper. In that
case, yes, you are stealing.
Hey is that you doing that to the dumpster of our building
because we've been looking for you!
Refuse hauling costs good money. People pay for it. When (as
happens to us from time to time) someone comes and fills up your
receptacle, depriving you of use of it, now you are paying to
have that other person's garbage hauled. It's against the
law and it is certainly a civil offense. (And it's a real
problem when it happens! It's just rude if nothing
else.)
Am I stealing when I throw a rock from a gravel road I
don't live on?
You mean that you don't own. As with the garbage cans, it
depends on the scale. One little kid throws three rocks into the
pond before a responsible adult says "don't do
that"? Hardly a crime. A gang of teens starts hanging out by
the pond to sneak smokes and while there they idly clear 10ft of
road of gravel? You betcha that's stealing. Stupid teenagers.
Damn kids.
Am I stealing when I let my dog take a sip of water from an
irrigation ditch that's not my farm, when I'm out
taking a walk?
No, that's trespassing and reckless endangerment. Please keep
your deficating and urinating animal away from that ditch. That
water winds up on your food.
Of course, I still like "Big Tony" in the Simpsons,
explaining to Bart why he'd like his boys from the
gentleman's club to store a truck full of bootleg cigarettes
in the Simpson's house: "Bart, suppose a man's
family is starving. Is it wrong for him to steal a loaf of
bread? Well, suppose the man's family happens to like
cigarettes...."
"throw garbage into a garbage can that's not mine"
Argh...pet peeve of mine. There is an individual in the
area that is sneaking a bag of their trash into my trash after I
put mine out, and it costs me an extra $1.25 for every bag they
add to my trash. Numerous times, I have sorted through the
trash they have added to mine, looking for some identification,
but they have carefully snipped all the addresses off of all
envelopes and receipts each time.
I adjusted the time I put out trash until much closer to pickup
time, but they just adjusted theirs to be even later. My
drop off point is not visible from the house, so I can't
stand and watch. Have considered getting a wireless camera
to watch for them...
there's someone in our cul-de-sac that throws their excess
nasty garbage into our recycling bins which then means it
won't be taken away and bin gets big orange very sticky
sticker stuck to it too, been thinking about that wireless camera
too for some 21st century community justice (which means mailing
photograph of the perp doing their dirty deed to all neighbors,
maybe put picture on my family web site too. ridicule and
shame, just like the puritans and their stockades but without the
back ache and rotten fruit)
:) Already tried the note route. The fact that the
individual takes the time to snip all identifying information off
envelopes and receipts indicates that he/she is aware they are
doing wrong and don't care.
The individual is putting the trash on mine inbetween the time
that I put the trash out the morning the trash is picked up, and
the time the truck rolls past and picks it up, so a lock would
not help any, since it would have to be unlocked for the trashman
to pick up the trash.
In my area you pay for a certain size bin to be disposed of
weekly, and pickup is in front of your house. The cost
appears on your monthly utilities (water/sewer/garbage) bill from
the Village.
If your bin isn't 100% full, someone else popping some trash
in isn't stealing. It costs neither you nor them an
extra cent. I've done it before, when I find rubbish
floating around on the street. I pop it into the nearest
non-full bin, if it is trash day.
Anything above and beyond your allotted bin requires a special
sticker, which you purchase. You can stack 20 bags of
rubbish to be picked up, but if they aren't accompanied by 20
brightly colored stickers (about $3.50 each), they'll still
be there that afternoon. Compostable yard waste is bagged,
tagged and priced differently. Recyclable material is comingled,
free pickup and unlimited in volume.
In the previous city I lived in (a large Dallas suburb), for a
fixed monthly cost, ANY amount of trash was allowed each
week. When we moved, for three weeks running, I threw away
approx 50 black 30gal lawn bags of junk each week. Yes, the
attic had gotten THAT FULL of useless stuff. All the good
stuff went to the salvation army, all the electronics in one
pile, all the recycleable stuff in another pile, and all the semi
good stuff was piled in a separate spot on the curb so the
scavengers could have what they wanted, but the city was really
set up to handle it. Any LARGE items (sofas, refrigerators,
filing cabinets,etc) were picked up by a special claw truck.
Should we have generated/kept so much useless stuff? Of
course not. But it was nice to be able to get rid of it as
fast as we could shovel, when the time came to change our ways.
Yeah. When I was in Idaho you could dump as much as you
want, as long as you hauled it yourself to the county dump and
were a resident of that county. (Not all counties in Idaho
were that way, but where I lived was.) It did come in handy
when moving.
The Village where I now live has a "free garbage day"
once a year, in Spring. You can unload anything and
everything, including construction waste, for free on that
weekend. People come from miles around with large trucks to
pick thru what goes out. We nabbed a full oak dining set,
table and 6 chairs, this year. Not a darn thing wrong with
it, just the people got a new one.
This year was different in that people were driving around in
rented U-Haul trucks picking thru metal. As far as I can
tell, not one piece of metal made it to actual pickup this year.
Hmmm...my wife and I have taught our children that anything that
is not theirs, no matter how small, is to be treated with
respect. That means not keeping ANY overage if a clerk
miscounts, etc.
Now, we STILL have difficulty getting them to treat their OWN
stuff with respect, sometimes. ;)
Given the "moral" examples in the newspaper every day
that hold up investment bankers "shorting" stocks and
regular bankers overleveraging loans at 40x the rate of deposits,
we're worried about students stealing from stores and
cheating on tests?
The whole damn system is ethically suspect and bankrupt, these
kids are just mimicing what they see the adults do.
But you know what? They don't have to. Sure, it
can be used as an excuse, but it's not an excuse. These
kids know it's wrong, otherwise why would the results have to
be confidential in order to get them to admit they are liars and
thieves? (Confidentiality is not mentioned in this artice, I saw
it in the article I read a few days ago on this story.)
Yes, it seems to be universal now. We live in a small,
rural school district, and theft has gotten to be such a problem
at the school that the school administration has given up even
trying to catch/discipline culprits.
My children have had shoes, sweaters, etc. stolen. Yeah,
and we have to replace them, of course. It's especially
bad when it happens to be the kid's basketball shoes, and we
have to buy another pair of the shoes so the child can suit out
and play for the team.
Shoot...a couple of cameras watching the lockers would do
wonders.
Of course, this is a school that apparently has some kids that
think it's a hoot to slit all the tires on all the
busses. Replacing THOSE certainly put a dent in a poor
rural district's finances...
Well, given the curve though- if they don't, somebody else
will, and they'll get
a lower grade because of it.
Same reason the bankers did it in a way- if they didn't offer
credit to the poor at usurious prices, goes the thinking,
somebody else will, and
we can't have THEM getting the profits!
The problem with unethical behavior is once it's allowed in,
it taints EVERYTHING, and the honest man will suffer.
This reminds me of a rather discusting news story I read recently
(link).
I'm still realtivly young (late 20's) but behaviour like
this discusts me. The sad thing about many of this kids is that
the driver will probably have a new car in a couple of weeks and
the accident forgotten.
I am proud to say that I never cheated in school (although was
once "accused" of it after submitting an assignment
that was actually given a mark of 100%, something that I put in a
lot of work for) or university. I'm sure many who cheated
will find out the hard way once getting into the workforce that
there cheating hasn't helped them. It's pretty obvious
who has no clue as a software engineer once you have worked with
them for a short period.
Status of Ethics with Younger People
An interesting survey here about US High School students and ethics, stealing, cheating on papers, etc. Apparently, there is a disconnect, a lot of students in the anonymous survey admitted to stealing from stores or even friends and parents, or cheating on tests, yet they consider themselves to be highly ethical and "better than" their friends when it comes to these issues.
ed.z.: Some pretty high numbers there. Would be interesting to compare them to current adult levels on the same sort of questions.