Daylight saving actually wastes more electricity than it saves,
according to a recent study
[PDF] of Indiana's energy use (reported
in the Wall Street Journal). This may reflect changing energy
usage.
The main difference between now and the 1970s is the prevalence
of household air conditioning. The extra hours at home in the
afternoon with the AC on consumes more energy than is saved by
decreased lighting.
Important caveat: this study looked only at Indiana, which
implemented daylight savings in a haphazard enough way to provide
a nearly random sample. Other states and climates may have much
different results. In particular, more northern states may use AC
less.
wastes time and money and mental health and integrity of automated operations (still see DST patches for all manner of OS and devices coming out with USA specific changes, for example) doing the clock adjustments. Even if DST is found to save energy, may just as well stay on it all year long now that we're doing it for most of the year. enough with this clock changing stupidity.
Where I live it makes sense for my lifestyle to change the clocks.
In the summer, I like the extra hour of daylight after work to do things. In the winter, it would get dark too early if we did not go back.
Of course, instead of changing the clocks, the government could instead direct that all establichments adjust their opening and closing hours instead... Good luck with that.
or the government could just butt out altogether, since it's unclear whether or not there is even a net benefit.
just looked at state of California's energy commission report on the results of 3 week's earlier DST, they can't tell from statistical noise but then say well maybe we saved 0.2%, or not. I'm calling BS on the whole thing.
What? "in the winter it would get dark too early if we did not go back"? Huh? By "going back" in the winter, it gets dark earlier, not later. Sounds like you'd like DST year-round.
Don't want DST year round. I am in a good bit of pain for the past few days due to busting up my shoulder. Didn't think it was affecting my thinking though.
Perhaps it would be school and work starting in the dark. I do know I have thought of staying DST year round and decided it is better in our location and with out lifestyle to switch back.
Daylight savings time is good, no matter whether it saves energy or not. Too often people try to put quality of life beneath economic savings to the detriment of many. Here in Victoria we will be starting daylight savings at the sart of October this year, and I must say I will be very pleased by the change --- everyone knows I would like it to start earlier. Changes to the Sun's rising and setting times screw around with my sleep much more than changes to the clock and so I like the chance to have a closer synchronisation. The only thing I'd like better than daylight savings time is if we could synchronise sunrise with 6.00 am, as was historically done before clocks were half decent, except in these days of strict and accurate time measurement that would be much too difficult to implement.
eek, thought was typing in regular comment about lawmakers only ones being idiotic enough to come with DST and now I see it in article! big mistake, sorry everyone. No apology to lawmakers who think DST changings twice a year makes sense though
Does daylight saving waste electricity?
Daylight saving actually wastes more electricity than it saves, according to a recent study [PDF] of Indiana's energy use (reported in the Wall Street Journal). This may reflect changing energy usage.
The main difference between now and the 1970s is the prevalence of household air conditioning. The extra hours at home in the afternoon with the AC on consumes more energy than is saved by decreased lighting.
Important caveat: this study looked only at Indiana, which implemented daylight savings in a haphazard enough way to provide a nearly random sample. Other states and climates may have much different results. In particular, more northern states may use AC less.