Cargo ships that ply the global trade routes all rely on water
filled ballast tanks--and are one of the primary reasons for non
native species invasion, especially into the Great Lakes.
Researchers have tried to come up with solutions to combat this
threat, and current ideas are various sterilization add-ons that
would neutralize any potential biological threat held in the
tanks, but they are very expensive and not widely implemented
yet, although soon they might be required by legislation. An
alternative proposal came from University of Michigan engineers
who propose elimination of the whole ballast tank idea in favor
of constantly
circulating new water, meaning at any given point in the
travels, anything there would most likely be native to that area,
or non invasive. An additional benefit was discovered with their
scale models in that it really increased the efficiencies of the
vessel, leading to significant fuel savings.
.."Instead of hauling potentially contaminated water
across the ocean, then dumping it in a Great Lakes port, a
ballast-free ship would create a constant flow of local seawater
through a network of large pipes, called trunks, that runs from
the bow to the stern, below the waterline."
An idea I had for my boat design (which I've since abandoned due to increased cost & complexity) was to use a pair of cordless drills to run a pair of ducted Archimedes screws for a drive. This sounds somewhat similar- if done with enough force, instead of the ballast taking fuel to haul it would become a part of the ship's propulsion as water is taken in at the bow and squirted out at the stern. The key is to add a narrowing of the trunk pipe from bow to stern to create a nozzle, and a pump someplace halfway through.
I thought there was ballast water in the oil tanks, with the
oil floating on top of it, so that there would be no air in
the oil tanks. Is it not that way any longer?
Different logic in the old blog code and the new blog code.
My comment was posted with the new software and there's a
field that's set slightly differently. Rather than fix the
old stuff, I'm going to retire it about three weeks.
An Alternative for Ballast Tanks on Ships
Cargo ships that ply the global trade routes all rely on water filled ballast tanks--and are one of the primary reasons for non native species invasion, especially into the Great Lakes. Researchers have tried to come up with solutions to combat this threat, and current ideas are various sterilization add-ons that would neutralize any potential biological threat held in the tanks, but they are very expensive and not widely implemented yet, although soon they might be required by legislation. An alternative proposal came from University of Michigan engineers who propose elimination of the whole ballast tank idea in favor of constantly circulating new water, meaning at any given point in the travels, anything there would most likely be native to that area, or non invasive. An additional benefit was discovered with their scale models in that it really increased the efficiencies of the vessel, leading to significant fuel savings.
.."Instead of hauling potentially contaminated water across the ocean, then dumping it in a Great Lakes port, a ballast-free ship would create a constant flow of local seawater through a network of large pipes, called trunks, that runs from the bow to the stern, below the waterline."
ed.z.: "engage the caterpillar drive!"