A 16-year-old kid in Canada, Daniel Burd, followed through on a
remarkably intuitive and extremely scientific set of
experiements- to find a bacteria that is EXTREMELY effective in
eating those stupid thin-film polyethylene bags that are a large
part of the non-recycleable litter in first world nations.
The Register (who else) is a wonderful article that also
references phage-therapy antibacterial methods and the lack of
this story on the BBC, heralds young Daniel
Burd's discovery as one heck of an eco-discovery.
He's achieved (admittedly in the lab, under controlled
conditions similar to a homebrewer making beer) an amazing 42%
reduction in weight of plastic over 6 weeks. Based on this, he
reckons that anybody can have a 5 gallon METAL bucket of these
buggies or three, and break down the bags at home- with each bag
disappearing within 3 months of depositing in the fermenter.
Of course, one could point out that this 16-year-old probably
didn't use proper isolation techniques to keep his buggies
out of the environment - but all the strains he worked with he
found in the local landfill to begin with, and he did, after all,
keep them in a sealed container for the first 6 weeks while
feeding them ONLY garbage bags to isolate the final four strains.
Thanks- I thought that looked wrong, but I thought it was my
misspelling. Maybe Shannon's form of dyslexia is
getting into my head too- a spelling checker is no good for her
because she gets the meanings of words mixed up.
actually, most oil produced over history has migrated to the
surface (lighter than rock or water) and been eaten by
bacteria. special conditions must exist for it to be
trapped underground. And in the "oil window", the
depths that have the right temperature to form or keep oil
(without either so hot it cracks it into gas or too low it just
stays kerogen), where temperatures are from 60 to 120 degrees C
(150 to 250 degrees F) it's too hot for most bacteria.
that would be a great experiment for another kid to do, find bug
that eats the polystyrene, can feed it packing material and foam
peanuts and cd cases and ring-holders for cans.
funny there is a recycling "resin identification code",
6, for it but it isn't recycled, not economical.
My local council tells us to put all numbered plastics (1-7) in
recycling. Presumably they are recycling it all. I
guess there is a possibility they are dumping some but getting
people in the groove for the future, when they can recycling
everything.
last time I checked only two types were being recycled in my
area, though maybe that's changed in last two years
we need a recycling center in the area that takes the other
kinds, or maybe we just need to outlaw things like the foam
peanuts and packing, there are biodegradable alternatives
(actually, the starch based ones are even edible!)
hah, since no one else is doing it around here the effort and
money spent would be pointless and make no difference in volume
of material going into landfill. so, I won't do it.
I'm one of those people that doesn't do things for mere
"feel good" or "raise awareness" reasons
(i.e., bending over far backward to blow sunshine up my own
keister).
stupid thin-film polyethylene bags that are a large part of
the non-recyclable litter in first world nations.
And an even bigger part of the non-recyclable waste in Third
World countries. Not that many Third-World countries recycle
much, though you might see some very poor people picking through
the waste to find stuff they can sell for a few cents or eat.
But in countries like Thailand or Indonesia, a generation ago
food was packaged in banana leaves or perhaps paper. It was
casually discarded and rotted down pretty quickly. Now
polyethylene is almost universally used, but people still drop it
anywhere, and it blows around, floats on waste water, or is burnt
and releases toxic fumes. Many watercourses, and the ocean
itself, are clogged with huge drifts of plastic bags that have
floated down the drains and rivers. Sometimes the local beaches
in Hong Kong are a soup of floating plastic, local and flushed
down the Pearl River from China.
In all honesty, and in light of prior discussions on this subject
here, the title should really be "16-Year-Old DISCOVERS
Plastic-Eating Bacteria", as opposed to
"engineers".
He didn't make it, he isolated it from samples found in the
wild.
16-Year-Old Engineers Plastic-Eating Bacteria
A 16-year-old kid in Canada, Daniel Burd, followed through on a remarkably intuitive and extremely scientific set of experiements- to find a bacteria that is EXTREMELY effective in eating those stupid thin-film polyethylene bags that are a large part of the non-recycleable litter in first world nations.
The Register (who else) is a wonderful article that also references phage-therapy antibacterial methods and the lack of this story on the BBC, heralds young Daniel Burd's discovery as one heck of an eco-discovery. He's achieved (admittedly in the lab, under controlled conditions similar to a homebrewer making beer) an amazing 42% reduction in weight of plastic over 6 weeks. Based on this, he reckons that anybody can have a 5 gallon METAL bucket of these buggies or three, and break down the bags at home- with each bag disappearing within 3 months of depositing in the fermenter.
Of course, one could point out that this 16-year-old probably didn't use proper isolation techniques to keep his buggies out of the environment - but all the strains he worked with he found in the local landfill to begin with, and he did, after all, keep them in a sealed container for the first 6 weeks while feeding them ONLY garbage bags to isolate the final four strains.