In a move to supposedly better support their userbase, Microsoft
sponsors program that gathers information about adoption and
usage of Free Open Source Software.
Microsoft joined as a co-sponsor of the Open Source Census (OSC).
More information to better support those clients who use FOSS or
is it really to better compete?
From OpenLogic's (the parent company of the OSC) team website:
Steven L. Grandchamp, CEO . . .
Steven also held various senior management positions with
Microsoft including the application development segment of
Microsoft Consulting Services. Steven spent the early part of his
career in progressively responsible IT roles in the banking
industry.
I'm sure that not all companies involved have ulterior
motives but I doubt seriously that all involved don't.
The census is really rather rediculous, I'm afraid.
Submissions are anonymous, so it's easy to stuff the ballot
box. They don't keep or verify IP addresses. So, it ends up
being a pretty good way to lie with statistics.
Makes sense to me, they could probably get a lot more out of the
OSC in terms of disinformation than with critical or factual data
that could be mined for better ways to compete. The
strategy of acquisition does not work for Microsoft when they
deal with FOSS, so it's only inevitable that they pile on the
FUD and lawsuit threats thickly.
I had never heard much about this group before reading this
story. Perhaps someone could do a story researching them
and all of their sponsors.
Reminds me of the book I read in college by Darrel Huff called
"How to Lie with Statistics".
Reminds me of the book I read in college by Darrel Huff
called "How to Lie with Statistics".
Isn't that by Polya?
The company running the survey, OpenLogic, is legitimate. But
they may be another Open Source support aggregation company that
isn't working out too well and will take anyone's money
no matter what the damage. The project is lame. Sorry OpenLogic
folks, that's how I see it.
There is a nice lady at OpenLogic named Stormy Peters who worked
with me at HP. She's probably between a rock and a hard place
as far as this is concerned. I used to work at SourceLabs,
half-time and not as a founder because I was too busy being a dad
to little Stanley to be a CEO. Sourcelabs attempted to fill the
same niche of being an Open Source service aggregator, and we
didn't get rich although they're still trying. And
SpikeSource ended up doing a lot of Microsoft-related work
instead of trying to fill that niche. So, OpenLogic?
It sounds as if HP and IBM are getting a lot of that business
because they service hardware too. No finger-pointing.
Yeah, I saw Stormy's picture and read her information before
posting this and thought the same thing actually. Hmmhmm,
no finger-pointing is understood. Adoption of Free Software
is not going to happen without involvement of business and
commerce.
I work at a medium sized photography company in the I.T.
department and I'm always trying to push Free Software
alternatives to the closed tools that we use. Effective
even less when I start espousing in terms of my strong opinions
against proprietary software and the social benefits of Free
Software. Not going to stop me from surrounding my cubicle
with Free Software paraphernalia, cursing Microsoft all day, or
telling people at work that they should GNU/Linux at home
instead, though.
Microsoft Joins Open Source Usage Spying Program
In a move to supposedly better support their userbase, Microsoft sponsors program that gathers information about adoption and usage of Free Open Source Software. Microsoft joined as a co-sponsor of the Open Source Census (OSC). More information to better support those clients who use FOSS or is it really to better compete?
From OpenLogic's (the parent company of the OSC) team website:
Steven L. Grandchamp, CEO . . .
Steven also held various senior management positions with Microsoft including the application development segment of Microsoft Consulting Services. Steven spent the early part of his career in progressively responsible IT roles in the banking industry.
I'm sure that not all companies involved have ulterior motives but I doubt seriously that all involved don't.