The crew were temporarily distracted and disoriented, but managed
to land safely.
This has become something of an epidemic in Australia, with dumb
kids shining the laser pointers at aircraft attempting to land at
Sydney Airport.
There is a nice flash video of what this looks like from the
cockpit
here.
In response, the Government has banned the importation and use of
these lasers unless the operator has good cause. Theoretically,
this should not impact Astronomers and laser light shows!
Class 3 and 4 lasers however have been declared as prohibited
weapons, and carrying them could attract a jail sentence of 14
years.
That's not a slight exaggeration. It's an extreme
exaggeration. 30 firearms does not make an arsenal. If it
included such things as a blunderbuss, that makes me wonder how
many of that 30 was also blackpowder in nature.
Hell, I've got eight right now, with plans for at least eight
more. Probably more than that. I also found the article rather
sensationalistic. Although that isn't overly surprising.
None of this, of course, excuses the moron from shining lasers at
boats and such. That's just stupid.
Unenforceable law is an avenue to abuse, selective application
and corruption. The class of a laser depends on what optics
are attached to it. No police officer is qualified to
determine what class a laser belongs to if the classification
labels on it have been removed. The law can be translated
as "don't piss a police officer off if you are carrying
*any* type of laser".
The law is mistargeted as the problem is columnated light
sources, not lasers. The law will not solve the problem of
planes being targeted but will inconvenience and block those who
require a coherent light source. Any small light source can be
columnated and used to dazzle a pilot, for example a car
headlight with columnating optics. Searchlights were used
to dazzle pilots before the invention of the laser. Only
the laser is practical for making holograms or doing optical
experiments with coherent light. No other light source has
the frequency response of a laser diode. The NSW government
has just blocked innovation in the field of optics, without
protecting planes.
No police officer is qualified to determine what class a
laser belongs to if the classification labels on it have been
removed
I agree with you on this point.
But it can be referred back to an expert in this field.
I think that the main target of these laws is the brain dead teen
who can order these laser pointers straight off e-bay. He
wouldn't know how to focus a headlight beam for instance, but
does know how to operate an on / off switch.
The NSW government has just blocked innovation in the field
of optics, without protecting planes.
I presume that you mean the lasers that are now prohibited?
Would a licensing system provide a suitable balance between
protecting people from idiots and technological innovators?
To play Devils advocate for a minute...What do you think would
work to stop these teens (Although one person caught by the
police was in his mid twenties!) from obtaining these portable
lasers and beaming them towards aircraft?
Licensing schemes make the assumption that the developer is
affiliated with a University or company with the profile and
resources to go through the registration process. They lock
out the Bill Hewlett and David Packards of this world.
There is nothing wrong with a person (including a teen) obtaining
or possessing a laser. (The law doesn't distinguish between
portable/non-portable.) To think otherwise is to do away with the
presumption of innocence. There is something wrong with a
person (teen or not) shining that laser at an aeroplane.The law
was already adequate to deal with people shining lights at
aircraft. Shine a light at an aeroplane and you have broken
the law and can go to gaol. Simple. This is about the
government being too stingy to provide the resources to enforce
the law as it stands and the police grabbing extra powers because
they are on offer.
This isn't really any different than the continual Gun
Control debate. Banning an item doesn't mean the item
won't be procured and used anyway. About the only thing that
will work is hammering the people who misuse the item. What the
item is doesn't really matter. Be it a gun, a laser, a can of
gas, almost anything can be abused by someone.
You catch and hammer the daylights out of the people who misuse
the item. Only then will you likely see a reduction in its
misuse.
Unenforceable law is an avenue to abuse, selective
application and corruption.
Its a bit like now you can be arrested in Victoria for carrying a
spray can of paint on public transport. Perhaps I could get
arrested for doing that if I buy some paint in the city and take
it home on the tram. But if it goes to court I should be able to
argue that I had not intention of spraying graffiti.
The law will not solve the problem of planes being
targeted but will inconvenience and block those who require a
coherent light source.
Just rip the laser from a DVD writer. Probably pick up a few for
free on hard garbage day. If you are building instrumentation
then yes you need a permit.
Simple, stupid laws might keep things like this out of the hands
of idiots. Its not an elegant solution but it might be good
enough.
If one has to go to court as a matter of course to argue
one's innocence then the law is broken/ambiguous and needs
cleaning up.
Its not an elegant solution but it might be good enough.
In this context "good enough" would seem to mean
"affects only a minority". Most minorities would
disagree that such solutions are good enough and view them as mob
rule.
It shoud be possible for the police to pay a somebody to cook up
a laser locator. It just has to use GPS, attitude information and
a terrain model to derive a coordinate on the ground from a pulse
of laser light.
It is such a potentially useful device that the investment would
be worth it I am sure. Imagine being able to give police on the
ground the ability to designate positions close to them the
bad guy is in that car and so forth.
Agree. Also in a typical smoggy city, despite a laser beam being
"invisible" there is probably enough scattering that
the detector can be on the ground near an airport rather than on
every aeroplane. The detector(s) could be fitted with very narrow
band filters, tuned to the common laser wavelengths. In this way
they can be made extremely sensitive. Photodiodes have a massive
dynamic range or an array of photo-multipliers could be used
(used in tank night scopes). Cool them for even better
sensitivity. I've got an old tank scope here. I'll have
to get it going and see whether it can detect a laser beam
through "clear" air. I reckon it will as the specs say
it will give a usable image under starlight only.
Any small light source can be columnated and used to dazzle a
pilot, for example a car headlight with columnating optics.
Then good on them for only reacting to a specific, proven threat
rather than blanket-banning everything that could be used in
principle to attack a plane.
Only the laser is practical for making holograms or doing
optical experiments with coherent light. No other light
source has the frequency response of a laser diode. The NSW
government has just blocked innovation in the field of optics,
without protecting planes.
While I agree that this is an over-reaction (I thought it would
make more sense to have a licensing scheme such as is used for
pyrotechnics), this is hardly accurate.
Very few people need a 50mW visible laser, and those who do
(mostly industry and research) are already well familiar with the
paperwork involved in getting otherwise prohibited goods.
I work in a chemistry lab, and we use ingredients like powdered
aluminium, so you can imagine what we have to go through.
It'll be an annoyance, but no showstopper.
The response is over the top given that there are millions of
lasers out there and only a tiny number are being abused. That is
hardly proof that lasers are a problem. On top of that
The legislation makes no mention of laser power. It is just
as illegal to have a death ray as a class 1 laser, which is
unconditionally safe to the point where it might not even cause a
blink reflex. The legislation is more brain dead than responding
to the bushfire threat by requiring a pyrotechnics license for
every box of matches. At least a match has the potential to cause
the problem being addressed, unlike a class 1 laser. Licensing
might be an annoyance to institutions but is a show stopper for
individuals involved in laser based R&D. Similarly the
exemptions are worthless to an individual who will have to
provide the cash for a court defence when they are arbitrarily
charged.
Like guns, lasers are tools. They have good uses and bad. Banning
them is not practical. Government registration isn't
particularly useful either.
The reasons for this sort of stupidity have to do with two
things: Aviation noise, and fear of black helicopters.
Aviation noise hate has been going on since the dawn of the
commercial jet age at the very least. The helicopter conspiracy
BS has been around since the 1970s.
Eventually I expect that these fools will cause a crash. I
can't wait to see what they get charged with. How about a
first degree murder charge for each person on board who dies and
first degree assault for each person who survives, not to mention
a civil suit for the repair or replacement cost of the aircraft
if it is damaged.
Their freedoms will be gone for the rest of their miserable lives
--just as if they'd used a gun or a car to kill someone.
I think an advertising campaign ought to set these guys straight.
The reasons for this sort of stupidity have to do with two
things: Aviation noise, and fear of black helicopters.
Aviation noise hate has been going on since the dawn of the
commercial jet age at the very least. The helicopter conspiracy
BS has been around since the 1970s.
Aircraft noise is an issue in Sydney, but not really in
Melbourne. I fly in and out of Melbourne occasionally for work
holidays and I have seen green laser pulses on about half the
flights I have been on so it is a serious problem here.
Targeting a police helicopter was a really stupid thing to do
because of their habit of flying low and slow and their ability
to light the offender up from the air. Everybody knows what the
police do with their helicopters. I don't think anybody is
paranoid about it, which is not to say everybody likes having
them there. Shining a laser at them isn't going to make them
go away. The people doing this are stupid, but they are not total
idiots.
They are not afraid of any consequences. They do not fear
the police (One of them actually shone the laser towards the
driver of the police car that had come to arrest him!)
Actions need consequences. It's how humans attempt to
maintain decent society.
The reasons for this sort of stupidity have to do with two
things: Aviation noise, and fear of black helicopters
I have to completely disagree I'm afraid.
It started with one incident. Within a month there were
multiple copy cats. This is simply a case of bored feral
children seeing an idea and thinking that they should join in
because all the bad mutha f*ckers do it.
We have the same issue around bush fire time.
I can honestly say that I have never heard anyone in Australia
talk about black helicopters before!
Mix boredom with anything else and you'll get similar
results. Boredom with cars yeilds accidents. Boredom with
chemicals yeilds an explosion or chemical burns. Boredom with
lasers gives you aviation accidents. Boredom with guns yeilds
injuries or death.
I could go on.
The point is that this is a social malaise, not something you
could fix by banning the tool. Yes, aviation noise and black
helicopters are the excuses that people would use here in the US.
But you're correct that the deeper cause is boredom.
The solution is a more engaging society, one that includes kids
in productive work; not shunting them off to the side, hoping
they don't get in to something destructive.
Idiots with green laser pointers...
Australian Police have just arrested a 19-year-old man who shone a green laser at a Police helicopter.
The crew were temporarily distracted and disoriented, but managed to land safely.
This has become something of an epidemic in Australia, with dumb kids shining the laser pointers at aircraft attempting to land at Sydney Airport.
There is a nice flash video of what this looks like from the cockpit here.
In response, the Government has banned the importation and use of these lasers unless the operator has good cause. Theoretically, this should not impact Astronomers and laser light shows!
Class 3 and 4 lasers however have been declared as prohibited weapons, and carrying them could attract a jail sentence of 14 years.