I've run into an interesting phenomenon concerning the
Macintosh. Various "broken Macs" can be found from
among the vast population of nontechnical Macintosh users. These
folks believe so strongly in the Macintosh software that when
their system stops working, they decide that the hardware is
broken, and often replace it, when it's really software that
is the problem.
Apple has made this worse, because some Mac disks require that a
driver image be resident on the disk for the disk to be accepted
by the OS. If the driver's been over-written, the disk
appears as physically broken under MacOS until the driver is
replaced.
The fallout of this is that the "broken Mac" often just
needs to have the disk wiped clean and the software reinstalled.
I guess this drives Apple sales. There are some bargains in
broken Macs to be had for the technically competent.
These folks believe so strongly in the Macintosh software
that when their system stops working, they decide that the
hardware is broken, and often replace it, when it's really
software that is the problem.
I think non-technical people generally don't make a
distinction between hardware and software. The computer for them
is the complete product. And anyway. If it breaks you can go out
and buy the latest and greatest.
If you're talking about really old Macs (ie, running
Mac OS 9 or earlier) then, yes, the disk does need to have all
sorts of driver partitions on the disk. If you use the Disk
Utility that's either on the hard drive, or on the
Installation CD, and initialise the disk, this will automatically
put the appropriate drivers on the disk.
Earlier versions of Mac OS X would also offer to install OS 9
drivers on the disk, but they're no longer essential. Current
versions of Mac OS X don't even use the old-skool Mac
partition tables, and instead work off GPT (GUID Partition
Tables) and don't require any special drivers.
If you initialise a disk under current versions of Mac OS X, as a
GPT disk, there will be a hidden EFI firmware partition of 128MB
(?) at the start of the disk, formatted as FAT.
Before about 6 months ago, this hidden EFI partition wasn't
used for much, but now currently shipping Macs all have the Apple
Hardware Test pre-installed on this hidden partition. You can
boot into this by holding down the D key at startup. You used to
need the installation media in the optical drive for this to work
(and the instructions were printed on the disc) but now it will
boot off the HDD for the AHT. Neat. This is exactly what the
hidden EFI firmware partition is supposed to be for.
There's also a great project called rEFIt - An EFI Boot Menu and
Toolkit that can live on this partition and provides a
graphical boot menu to select alternative operating systems
(Linux, Windows etc)
All that aside - if anyone hears of people ditching otherwise
working Macs - I'm always on the lookout in Melbourne ^_^
Reinstalling the OS is easy - insert the disc that came with the
Mac, hold down C on the keyboard as you boot and off you go. No
pesky serial numbers (for non server OS installation) and
it's a pretty straightforward install from there...
Interesting - the PowerBook G4 Titanium was a machine that
could well run Mac OS 9, and used Open Firmware, not EFI, as
it's firmware layer.
Machines with Open Firmware, from memory, need the appropriate
driver partitions on the disk, so if the disk was totally b0rked,
then it could quite conceivably show up as broken.
Using the Disk Utility should still quite happily show the disk
as physically present, whereby you can initialise it and the
driver partitions will be automatically created.
Having said all this, I've seen quite a lot of machines of
that age, particularly the laptops, come in with physical disk
errors (clicking, slow response etc) and replacing the hard drive
will have them back up and running, as good as new.
plenty of bargains in perfectly working macs adequate for normal
office (spreadsheet, browser, word processing) for under
$200. as I like to say, don't need a giga anything but
disk for that, not 1GHz of processor, not 1GB of ram, not giagbit
ethernet.
Yeah, for sure, I've got friends and family still doing
good work on old Graphite (dark grey) G4 towers. They can take a
gig or two of RAM, if you can find it anywhere, and anything with
an 867MHz or faster CPU can even run (walk?) the latest and
greatest version of Mac OS X 10.5.
These machines are great for general home use and a bit of
surfing the internet, and are now dirt cheap. They were built
well, are relatively standard with their components, at least the
components you'd want to upgrade (excluding the CPU) are -
RAM, HDD, optical drive, keyboard, mouse...
I just upgraded my Dad from a relatively ancient iMac (the oldest
model that still had FireWire) to a 2 year old Mac mini, and even
this machine is more power than he needs - 1.6GHz CPU, 1.5GB RAM,
and it's TINY... Thanks to FireWire and Target Disk Mode, it
was so easy to transfer his stuff over, boot the old machine
holding down T on the keyboard and it becomes dumb FireWire
external hard disk. Plug into new Mac, copy stuff over. Done.
You see that all the time, tons of mom and pop whitebox shops
main profits is fixing "broken" computers that just
have so much malware on them from folks being stuck with windows
that it gets to the point they think the whole thing is
"broken". I would bet right now millions of computers
have been literally thrown away as broken just because they were
running hosed windows installs. I saw this way way back DOS days
when I switched to macs when I saw how easy they were to use.
All, I mean every single one, of my still dos and then workgroup
and then 95 running friends all went through holy heck constantly
with stuff not working, viruses, whatnot, and I never had a lick
of trouble, software or hardware. I had one single mac break on
me (6400 performa), it took a direct lightning hit, the extension
cord running into our camper took the hit really, popped
everything running at the time, and the dang thing would still
boot! After the hit, the mobo was crispy, charred, nasty, smelled
bad, looked terrible, I took it outside, hosed it off, let it dry
for a day and it still worked! Slow, took a LONG time to finish
booting but it eventually did, pulled some junk off of it and
scrapped it then though. I went to linux when I got a deal on a
huge pile of rebuildable machines and parts, a young dude I knew
gave me a copy of linux because I needed a lot of legal software
to put on them, tried it, liked it, but it took me a full year to
even grok FOSS, but then I approved even more, and stuck with it.
Gradually used my powerbook less and less, now only when we have
a storm..heh. I will say I am sorely tempted to go back to a big
old mac, capable of holding a ton of ram, like one of their
servers, and using that until there are no more browsers for it
that work. Classic OS is just going to get safer and safer over
the years, and the sheer amount of still usable software out
there is outstanding. Old, but still works. It is a rough choice
sometimes, modern linux is becoming impractical on dialup, there
are just way too many megs of updates to stay current. It is
many, many megs per day and while they are downloading you
can't do a dang thing else with the machine, at least I
can't, and not a dialup ISP out there that won't boot you
eventually for running 24/7. Shoot, already been kicked off of
two cheaper ISPs for running too much the last coupla years. I
mean no login, with a nasty gram from them. Right now I am 150
megs behind on updates, I did almost 50 megs today during the
work day downloading, but it never ends. Tommorow I will knock
some more off of that, maybe 40 megs or so, but no idea what will
be added to the updates list either, and I only have just gnome!
I used to have both all the gnome and kde apps, that is just out
of the question now, way too big and too fast coming all the
time.
Yeah, ya gotta love it when you get a multi-hundred megabyte
update and the changelog says 'updated maintainer's email
address' or something trivial like that.
What they really need is an update scheme like the original etree
service, someone mails you a cd with updates and you mail it off
to the next person on the list. Never used it myself because I
had the broadband before I discovered the world of live legal
music but from what I can tell it did the job.
Well, in fairness, the other reason might well be that
Apple's hardware isn't as solid as their software.
I've owned a variety of Macs over time, and all exhibited
hardware faults.
Despite the opinions of most Mac-enthusiasts I've met, I
honestly don't think Apple's talents are best spent on
hardware, which is a shame, because right now they tie their
software to their hardware. Which is why I left. Ubuntu's
almost as good as Mac OS X anyway, and it's Free. In every
sense.
When Mac Owners Think Their Hardware is Broken
I've run into an interesting phenomenon concerning the Macintosh. Various "broken Macs" can be found from among the vast population of nontechnical Macintosh users. These folks believe so strongly in the Macintosh software that when their system stops working, they decide that the hardware is broken, and often replace it, when it's really software that is the problem.
Apple has made this worse, because some Mac disks require that a driver image be resident on the disk for the disk to be accepted by the OS. If the driver's been over-written, the disk appears as physically broken under MacOS until the driver is replaced.
The fallout of this is that the "broken Mac" often just needs to have the disk wiped clean and the software reinstalled. I guess this drives Apple sales. There are some bargains in broken Macs to be had for the technically competent.