Is the
economy really that bad, or are people just so used to fast
and increasing prosperity that we have lost sight of past reality
and are just whining about it more? By age and study, baby
boomers think it is really bad, younger folks and the already
retired think it is OK-normal and getting better.
The malaise stems in considerable part from a feeling that
individuals have become more vulnerable to forces beyond their
control. The American can-do spirit is not dead, of course.
Laid-off workers are finding new jobs, motorists are driving less
and cooks are trawling the internet for recipes to jazz up the
leftovers in the fridge. ed.z.: I'll do my own analysis
of the generational differences. This is very general and YMMV.
Older than the boomers went though ww2, which sort of sucked
thinking you might not make it and so on, and many remember the
great depression, even if they were just kids. they've seen
and lived through pretty tough times. Plus, they have their homes
long ago paid off and etc. and really were the first generation
on the planet earth to have superb pensions and so on in vast
numbers.
Younger folks are full of youthful enthusiasm and haven't
come to grips with aging yet and failing health and decades of
never ending bills and raising kids and so forth, right now it is
still lotsa drinking and concerts and so on, party down dude. Ya,
they work, but really..it is still party time and you'll live
forever time.
Boomers got all the responsibility, doing all the heavy work,
they are really looking hard at the economy and watching jobs
evaporate, savings evaporate, 401ks that might be fancy edged
toilet paper sometime, never ending medium sized wars and
wondering when the political dingbats will try to restart the
draft, making their kids eligible, bills, bills, more bills, and
so on. I mean, this ain't rocket surgery.
For the record, I don't "feel" like it is gloomy, I
double dang darn know it is gloomy because I can run simple sums
and any way you slice it, none of our fearless leaders numbers
add up to anything but gloom. I run on that principle, that it
has already half collapsed and if it gets even marginally better
that is welcome news, but I am not planning on it at all. All
those fast growing foreign nations that have been swapping real
stuff to the US by the container ship load or tanker ship load
for pictures of old fearless leaders on pieces of paper that are
being created by the truckload daily with nothing backing them
but more pictures of old fearless leaders on pieces of paper are
going to sometime just decide that is quite looney tunes insane
and just stop doing that. They'll just cut their losses and
walk away from it, and the planet earth got a lot more billions
of people for a market for them, people who have real stuff to
swap for real stuff. I mean, they sometimes just come out and
blatantly say that, remember last spring some big chinese economy
guy said china "had enough dollars now"? How blatant
does it have to get this is tightrope walking time? As of the
latest two banks to be seized/bailed out whatever you want to
call it this week, FDIC deposit account insurance is
"backed" by .35% assets. Deposits that are insured/cash
for payouts. That's a point in there ahead of those numerals.
And that's it. Feelin' lucky?
I've posted before with thoughts similar to this title
(although I wouldn't call it whining, more along the lines of
media hype). That doesn't mean I think the economy is great,
or that it won't get worse, but at this instant it's just
sort of schlepping along.
For some perspective, I believe 5 banks have failed so far.
Here's what wiki says about the S&L crisis of the
80s/90s:
"The U.S. government agency Federal
Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC), which at the
time insured S&L accounts in the same way the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation insures commercial bank accounts, then
had to repay all the depositors whose money was lost. From 1986
to 1989, FSLIC closed or otherwise resolved 296 institutions with
total assets of $125 billion. An even more traumatic period
followed, with the creation of the Resolution Trust
Corporation in 1989 and that agency’s resolution by
mid-1995 of an additional 747 thrifts.
[8]
There also were state-chartered S&Ls that failed. Some
state insurance funds failed, requiring state taxpayer
bailouts."
(John "Keating Five" McCain, come on down!)
The unemployment rate in the US in 1982 & 1983 was almost
10%! We've got 5%. I wonder how people will react if we even
get close to 10.
Again, things could get worse before they get better, and they
probably will given the size of the budget deficit & the fact
economies always slow down after a war ends. I do not envy the
next president of the US, whomever wins. They may be the Hoover
to Bush's Coolidge.
I think the baby boomers are gloomy because:
1) they're spoiled (how's that for a sweeping
generalization :)
2) they don't have the life long job security of many of
their parents generation
3) growing old sucks! I mean this in all seriousness.
I'm gloomy because the numbers don't match reality. While
the government claims 4% or less inflation, and 5% unemployment,
I'm seeing nearly 14% stagflation- some 9% of the unemployed
have been reclassified as "disabled" to hide them from
the statistics, and the price of fuel and food is through the
roof but isn't included in the official CPI.
I'm glad you feel secure- because I just had a desparate poor
person rob some pizza at gunpoint less than 10 blocks from my
home and then barricade himself in a house for 7 hours in a
standoff with the police.
And that is no longer unusual in this fire everybody at a whim
economy.
In the upper midwest the booming Reagan 80's were definitely
worse than the times now. That is when the big time industrial
jobs were lost and with the military build up of Reagan, the
states around the Great Lakes all had negative tax burdens around
$750 a head. i.e. more fed taxes taken than spent in the state.
That money was funding booms on the coasts. It is still true but
somewhat less today.
Now for all of the hand wringing, I see good high prices for ag
commodities, new markets popping up with ethanol and biodiesel,
wind projects going up all over the place. Things are kind of
jumping. We are all waiting for the feds to screw it up, and it
seems like there already is some kind of concerted effort to
badmouth ethanol and biodiesel - since it can't replace all
gas and since some bad ways to get it aren't too good - lets
throw it out with the bathwater.
Anywhere there were tax cutting governments put in the cities and
counties, I am seeing big problems now because these guys usually
gutted all the contingency funds, so I think we could see some
government bankruptcies by cities or county
governments. It is funny that the places screaming most around
here all elected people saying government can't do anything
right, cut taxes a lot and budgets a little. The places that kept
the "high" taxes are just rolling along now.
Those 5 that have failed had more assets than the 296 back in the
late-80s. We're currently at $400 billion and
climbing.
We don't have 5% unemployment if you use the same method of
calculating they did back in 1982 & 1983. It is closer
to 12%, though that is
arguable. What is unarguable is that the method of
calculating that number changed under Clinton's watch.
The government bailouts are so big, it is unreal. Any by
"government" that means taxpayers.
One of my 'friends' clients fought in WW2 and went
through the depression. Old school. Turns out that he had several
accounts at Indymac over the $100k limit, and took a hit after
Indymac went belly up recently. Fortunately not a large part of
his portfolio, however, as he learned to distribute his assets
based on the painful lessons he learned the first time around.
He was joking about this with my friend and said "Third
times the charm, i guess."
The upshot is that the US banking system is in serious trouble,
mostly because they *knew* the US would have to bail them out for
taking excessive risks if they got large enough fast enough. Add
to that the way Bush and Co have singlehandedly destroyed 50
years of fiscal responsibility from the federal reserve and the
gained respect of the international banking community by
basically gutting the dollar, and you have a recession. Maybe
even a depression.
But i think it is a little different creature this time around.
Part of it is that the traditional service/commodity industry is
changing, as is the realistic implications of intellectual
property, and part of it is that the creation of value is heading
back towards a distributed system again instead of the
centralized systems that have held sway over the past 60 years.
Interesting times ahead, folks.
We're currently in a slow-down and may or may not be at
bottom, but 1-2 years from now everybody will forget it ever
happened. Does anybody even care about the recession of 2001? A
flea on the elbow.
The oil supply/demand ratio is only going to keep going down and
is the big shorter-term issue, plus there's that whole
climate change nuisance. Those, plus health care and social
security are the bigger long term challenges.
I agree that there is a lot of whining going on, and for the
older generation it's a lot to do with resistance to change.
"When I was your age ... blah blah blah ... and that's
why the world is currently crap".
We're in a temporary rut. We have have some big challenges
ahead, but on the whole the world's population has never had
it so good.
I think Phil Graham (ironically) called the election for Obama
when he said the US is a nation of whiners in a mental
recession. In other words, "it's the economy,
stupid!"
I have to say that I am quite disconcerted by the new budget
deficit numbers. Half a trillion in the red after you count
the wars? The Democrats are often maligned as "tax and
spend Democrats," but in this environment that seems a far
sight better than the "borrow and spend Republicans"
who are running the show.
I was listening to a Marketplace podcast this morning... they
were saying that half a trillion number leaves out a substantial
portion of the costs of the various occupations.
yes. $80 bil for Iraq alone. Isn't that ridiculous!?!? If the
US doesn't spend another penny there, it won't help
reduce the "official" deficit at all...
I was with you until you characterized the post Baby-boomers by
adding
"and decades of never ending bills and raising kids and
so forth, right now it is still lotsa drinking and concerts and
so on, party down dude. Ya, they work, but really..it is still
party time and you'll live forever time"
Gen Xers are in their middle thirties with kids and mortgages and
just as many responsibilites as most Baby-boomers. Sure Gen
Xers still have fun, but claiming they spend most of their time
partying is disingenuous and shows your discriminatory
attitude. Even Gen Y is coming out of the
"partying" period of their life.
Sure younger people have more youthful enthusiasm and flexible
mental outlook. But they are also the ones at risk of a
draft reinstatement as you mentioned (whereas baby boomers are
not). Baby-boomer's only real unique drama is many of
them don't have pensions, are getting closer to retirement,
invested 401ks not terribly wisely, and have less time to make up
their errors.
As I see it, the real problem is Baby-boomers are the only
remaining generation that experienced no significant hardships in
their young adult period, and now that things aren't going so
well, they can't see light at the end of the tunnel.
"As I see it, the real problem is
Baby-boomers are the only remaining generation that experienced
no significant hardships in their young adult period"
Huh? Vietnam killed 10 times as many Americans than any war since
and that was the formative event in the young adult lives of Baby
Boomers. Not to mention Race riots in most North American
cities.
The baby boom generation is in fact the LAST generation that
faced real life and death in terms of the draft and 50,000 young
men and women killed.
I still remember the National Guard in the streets of my home and
the curfews and hate (and courageous people) of the race riots
also.
I did forget about Vietnam. As you can probably assume I am
a Gen Xer, so to me it was just a tragic ideological and military
error from history class. And we seem destined to repeat
it. But from speaking with my parents who were middle class
young adult Texas residents at the time, they don't seem that
affected by the race riots. I'm sure it depends on
where you grew up.
Yet with all you point out, why on Earth would Baby-boomers feel
like times are bad now, when they have seen so much worse, while
post Baby-boomers are more optimistic and this is their first
taste of discordant times. Saying they are still carefree
and drinking and partying is a bull crap non-reasoned response.
Economy-is it really bad, or is it just excessive whining?
Is the economy really that bad, or are people just so used to fast and increasing prosperity that we have lost sight of past reality and are just whining about it more? By age and study, baby boomers think it is really bad, younger folks and the already retired think it is OK-normal and getting better.
The malaise stems in considerable part from a feeling that individuals have become more vulnerable to forces beyond their control. The American can-do spirit is not dead, of course. Laid-off workers are finding new jobs, motorists are driving less and cooks are trawling the internet for recipes to jazz up the leftovers in the fridge. ed.z.: I'll do my own analysis of the generational differences. This is very general and YMMV. Older than the boomers went though ww2, which sort of sucked thinking you might not make it and so on, and many remember the great depression, even if they were just kids. they've seen and lived through pretty tough times. Plus, they have their homes long ago paid off and etc. and really were the first generation on the planet earth to have superb pensions and so on in vast numbers.
Younger folks are full of youthful enthusiasm and haven't come to grips with aging yet and failing health and decades of never ending bills and raising kids and so forth, right now it is still lotsa drinking and concerts and so on, party down dude. Ya, they work, but really..it is still party time and you'll live forever time.
Boomers got all the responsibility, doing all the heavy work, they are really looking hard at the economy and watching jobs evaporate, savings evaporate, 401ks that might be fancy edged toilet paper sometime, never ending medium sized wars and wondering when the political dingbats will try to restart the draft, making their kids eligible, bills, bills, more bills, and so on. I mean, this ain't rocket surgery.
For the record, I don't "feel" like it is gloomy, I double dang darn know it is gloomy because I can run simple sums and any way you slice it, none of our fearless leaders numbers add up to anything but gloom. I run on that principle, that it has already half collapsed and if it gets even marginally better that is welcome news, but I am not planning on it at all. All those fast growing foreign nations that have been swapping real stuff to the US by the container ship load or tanker ship load for pictures of old fearless leaders on pieces of paper that are being created by the truckload daily with nothing backing them but more pictures of old fearless leaders on pieces of paper are going to sometime just decide that is quite looney tunes insane and just stop doing that. They'll just cut their losses and walk away from it, and the planet earth got a lot more billions of people for a market for them, people who have real stuff to swap for real stuff. I mean, they sometimes just come out and blatantly say that, remember last spring some big chinese economy guy said china "had enough dollars now"? How blatant does it have to get this is tightrope walking time? As of the latest two banks to be seized/bailed out whatever you want to call it this week, FDIC deposit account insurance is "backed" by .35% assets. Deposits that are insured/cash for payouts. That's a point in there ahead of those numerals. And that's it. Feelin' lucky?