So, Sco sells something that wasn't their's in the first
place, to Sun. Novell owns it actually. So Sun might have some
fun. Or maybe
not.
What does this mean for Sun? Carey says, "In theory,
Novell could sue Sun directly, but its chances of success would
be slim. Furthermore, Novell is not interested in
pursuing/developing SVRX, and is more interested in its
reputation in the open source community. Its lawsuit against SCO
was political -- it got to wear the white hat. If it went after
Sun because of OpenSolaris, it would wear the black hat. It is
not likely to change hats now." ed.z.: [mode="wild
speculation"] Well, ok then, but suppose one day out on some
golf course or yacht, *someone* who has some pull just tells them
to go ahead and make some public waves. Are they going to say no?
Open Susaris? Open Soluse? Suse Solaris? Open Open?
Seriously, I am intrigued by what Bruce proposes here. I am
not sure what bearing it would have on Novell's deal with the
devil, but Sun is fast earning trust in the FOSS community and
Novell is of course losing it.
IANAL, but it seems to me that Sun, having relied in good faith
(unless some pesky e-mails prove otherwise) on representations by
Novell's agent, SCO, has a pretty good defense against any
suit from Novell.
If Sun had bought a license modification from some shady guy in a
trench coat, they'd have no defense at all, but they bought
it from Novell's authorized representative. This means that
Sun can use the "agency defense" in any litigation with
Novell, the principle being that one who relies in good faith on
the representations made by an agent cannot then be made to
suffer harm by the agent's master if the agent exceeded his
authority. The agent (SCO) is then liable for the damage, not the
third party.
Since SCO is about to be one with Niniveh and Tyre, that kinda
limits the ability to extract damages. More importantly,
Sun's agency defense works equally against any
successor-in-interest to Novell; that rules out the idea of
danger to Sun if Novell sold the SVRx copyrights (to the extent
they exist) to, say, Microsoft.
Lastly, there's an excellent chance that a final judgement in
the SCO-vs-Novell case could by itself rule out any attempt to
pursue SCO's licensees (= Sun here), because Novell will be
awarded damages from SCO for that license, making it a closed
issue they cannot relitigate. Again, this would foreclose any
litigation by successors-in-interest.
Summary: Independent of Novell's disinterest in pursuing Sun
for beeelions for open-sourcing SVRx IP in OpenSolaris, it would
be close to impossible for them or any successor to do so.
(Behind-the-scenes negotiation is still probable, but it'll
be quite undramatic, based on the paucity of big-time leverage.)
True, although I think it would still be tough to make that
proposition strongly enough to prevail in court. The standard of
proof there is kinda high, I think, so it'd be a gamble.
Besides, courts are weird; I've been following the sordid SCO
seppuku saga for years, and I'm amazed at the provable
misdeeds they've been allowed to escape any legal penalty
for. Of course, they've been losing right and left, which IS
a penalty of sorts, but I'd have thought things like
sanctions or perjury indictments would come into it, and they
haven't.
Sco Stings Sun
So, Sco sells something that wasn't their's in the first place, to Sun. Novell owns it actually. So Sun might have some fun. Or maybe not.
What does this mean for Sun? Carey says, "In theory, Novell could sue Sun directly, but its chances of success would be slim. Furthermore, Novell is not interested in pursuing/developing SVRX, and is more interested in its reputation in the open source community. Its lawsuit against SCO was political -- it got to wear the white hat. If it went after Sun because of OpenSolaris, it would wear the black hat. It is not likely to change hats now." ed.z.: [mode="wild speculation"] Well, ok then, but suppose one day out on some golf course or yacht, *someone* who has some pull just tells them to go ahead and make some public waves. Are they going to say no?