News publications are cautious about making accusations, and
because of that, some nasty acts of Microsoft are essentially
being erased from the record.
Only four months ago, a U.S. based Microsoft executive posed
as VP of a Malaysian IT Organization so that he could
influence that nation's vote on the ISO acceptance of OOXML,
according to Malaysian standards committee member Yoon Kit.
Today, I can't get one of the publications I write for to
allow me to make that claim, because nobody else has has
corroborated Yoon Kit's information online. I don't have
Yoon Kit's email, yet. Someone send it to me please.
Microsoft convinced Baystar Capital to put $50 Million
dollars into SCO's lawsuit against IBM and other Open Source
users, and promised to "backstop" Baystar's
investment if SCO lost money, according
to this sworn testimony. But I'm told that one
person's testimony, even sworn testimony, isn't proof.
Can you help me show more evidence?
Six years ago, Microsoft told other companies it would
sue Apache, the project it's just joined. HP's
internal memo on that briefing leaked two years later.
I was not at the meeting it describes, but saw the HP memo
shortly afterward had to keep quiet. Having been hired by HP to
be an Open Source leader first, and an HP employee second, I
never expected to have to keep Microsoft's plans to sue Open
Source projects secret. That was the NDA from hell because it
made me feel disloyal to my own community. But today, Linux.com,
where that memo is, appears too biased to some to be taken as
evidence. Can you corroborate that memo too?
Another issue would be to get daylight on the (presumably)
illegal contracts MS signs with schools and universities. BECTA
in the UK has been recently running into problems getting the
details of the current agreement. In other countries, it is
similar. For example, Uppsala got a "greater than"
90-percent discount on MS cruft somewhat recently. The details
should be available publicly by Swedish constitutional law. (FWIW
Norway and Finland have similar constitutional requirements)
Getting these details from public agencies regarding the
contracts said public agencies have signed for software and
services. Failing to publish these means it's not possible
for competition.
Crimes Microsoft Gets Away With - So Far
News publications are cautious about making accusations, and because of that, some nasty acts of Microsoft are essentially being erased from the record.
Only four months ago, a U.S. based Microsoft executive posed as VP of a Malaysian IT Organization so that he could influence that nation's vote on the ISO acceptance of OOXML, according to Malaysian standards committee member Yoon Kit. Today, I can't get one of the publications I write for to allow me to make that claim, because nobody else has has corroborated Yoon Kit's information online. I don't have Yoon Kit's email, yet. Someone send it to me please.
Microsoft convinced Baystar Capital to put $50 Million dollars into SCO's lawsuit against IBM and other Open Source users, and promised to "backstop" Baystar's investment if SCO lost money, according to this sworn testimony. But I'm told that one person's testimony, even sworn testimony, isn't proof. Can you help me show more evidence?
Six years ago, Microsoft told other companies it would sue Apache, the project it's just joined. HP's internal memo on that briefing leaked two years later. I was not at the meeting it describes, but saw the HP memo shortly afterward had to keep quiet. Having been hired by HP to be an Open Source leader first, and an HP employee second, I never expected to have to keep Microsoft's plans to sue Open Source projects secret. That was the NDA from hell because it made me feel disloyal to my own community. But today, Linux.com, where that memo is, appears too biased to some to be taken as evidence. Can you corroborate that memo too?