No, not one of the "run your car on water"
gimmicks. An MIT scientist is
claiming to have developed a new catalyst that allows the
splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen using 90% less energy
than the current methods.
Nocera's catalyst is made from cobalt, phosphate and an
electrode that produces oxygen from water by using 90 percent
less electricity than current methods, which use the costly metal
platinum.
Other claims are it is cheap, safe and highly tolerant of
impurities. The idea is to use solar panels to split water
during the day, and a fuel cell to produce energy at night.
An idea as old as solar electricity itself, but claiming to use
but a fraction of the power provided by contemporary solar
panels.
If it lives up to the claims, this could be a very interesting
development. More details
at EETimes.
Electrolysis was already over 50% efficiency, so it hasn't
been improved by a factor of 10.
Maybe they're just referring to the isolated efficiency of
the oxygen-producing electrode. That's where most of the
losses come from in current electrolysis technology.
Maybe not your car...but I have been thinking one of those
electrolysers plus a light weight powerful storage battery or
three and maybe you could get enough to run your little 3.5-5.0
horse briggs powered push mower on water for a half an hour or
something before the batt went flat. Heck, even ten minutes would
be fun and actually practical for me. I really only need enough
to fill one or two clipping/collection bags a day for chicken
"salad" I mow up for them every day (that's what I
would use it for) Maybe anyway.
Ya, I know just get a pure electric mower and..those things cost
3-4 hundred bucks for the cordless models! Nuts! I paid 450 clams
for my diesel datsun, sure as heck not going to pay that for a
freekin mower. I get close to running gas mowers / easily fixable
for like 5 bucks or free for hauling away. Just for a hoot you
understand. How many people have a hydrogen powered lawnmower
yet? Add a small solar panel to the handles, got a nifty angle
already right there, good enough from eyeballing it already, keep
it parked during the week facing south, keep the battery charged
that way, add water, turn it on, wait a few minutes for it to
build up some steam, then give it a yank, see if it runs.
That's the basic back of the envelope I got so far..some more
pesky engineering details I guess are needed, like I have no idea
amps needed to gases volume released and time for that, etc.. It
doesn't have to be efficient at all, just fire up and run for
awhile.
The idea is to make the lawnmowing cleaner, plus recycle a mower
and not need a new pure electric drive mower. Plus it would be
nifty cool. Did I mention cheap? Always a prime criteria around
here. Gasoline is 4 dollars a gallon. Adds up at the end of the
year. I go through around ..geez..most of my mowing is with
diesel, but I still use a lot of gas on the smaller ones, I fill
two 5 gallon cans around 6 times a year or so, more often in the
summer, say once a month I get ten gallons, fall and spring
around 7 gallons, winter only 5 gallons a month. Still adds up! I
can come up with like chunks of brass or copper, distilled water,
some black and decker NiMH cordless drill batteries, scrap wire,
and stuff like that. Glass jar, check. I looked into going
electric drive for various small engine things, no way, you just
can't get the parts cheap enough yet. Not that I have found
anyway, even with scrounging. You can get dinky Dc motors, but
not anything worth much if you want to actually do some work or
have a moving buggy of some kind. right back up into what gas
stuff costs or more. So I thought as long as we were cussing out
hydrogen, I'd be cranky and see if something there might
work, on a pure bleed/loss way. I know perpetual motion won't
work, you'll lose from an alternator drive rig, but a storage
battery as the fuel source, that was filled from solar
PV...that's not perpetual motion, just a string of efficiency
losses and energy transfers. I just don't know how much.
OK, everyone rank me for being stoopid! Might as well have some
sport here...
Then there's the "not" option and just go to making
ethanol and fool around with the carb some. Probably much easier.
As I understand the
current state of the art, the most efficient & effective
process which is doable by an individual would go something like
this: This electrolysis, Compression into a medium pressure
composite H2 pressure vessel, H2 Fuel cell, Inverter /
controller, 3 phase AC motor.
H2 is sincerely a
pain in the ass to deal with… it is so tiny it permeates
all sort of things most folks would expect it to. And I am not sure what sort of compressor would
be best suited for sort of thing but I think it’s pretty
obvious an individual won’t be shooting for LH2 in his
workshop at home and I am not aware of alternative storage /
consumption mechanism which has made it out the lab. (maybe
I’m wrong and some can tell us of one). The plumbing to deal with the H2 would also have
to something like stainless tubing… which actually
isn’t all that hard to deal with. But I am sure that the
metering devices won’t be cheap… actually none of
this would be cheap.
If I was a rural
farmer with some acreage and a desire to make my own fuel, I
would be looking very, very closely at the ongoing development of
GM cyanobacteria / algae / bacteria
for biodiesel or biobutanol
and the designs of associated closed
photoreactors. In my opinion, for the
purpose of an individual building a small volume fuel production
scheme in his workshop / backyard, this is superior in many ways
to the other methods of fuel production I have seen.
That could solve the problem of both solar and wind - how to
stabilize the grid. Put a fuel cell, electrolysis rig, and a very
simple storage system (like two tanks of water, connected: bubble
the H2 into one tank, displacing water into the other
tank). You don't need to store LOTS of hydrogen for a long
time - just a little for a few hours. During the day, feed the
grid, and what the grid doesn't need makes H2.
During the night, make electricity and water. Lather, rinse,
repeat.
Add that to Pickens's ideas for wind in the Central States,
stir in a touch of solar, and you could have something.
I know there has to be investors here who grok tech discoveries,
so I just checked on cobalt. Up to a couple of days ago it was
going cheap. I imagine this will change soon...
Electrolysis With a Twist
No, not one of the "run your car on water" gimmicks. An MIT scientist is claiming to have developed a new catalyst that allows the splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen using 90% less energy than the current methods.
Nocera's catalyst is made from cobalt, phosphate and an electrode that produces oxygen from water by using 90 percent less electricity than current methods, which use the costly metal platinum.
Other claims are it is cheap, safe and highly tolerant of impurities. The idea is to use solar panels to split water during the day, and a fuel cell to produce energy at night. An idea as old as solar electricity itself, but claiming to use but a fraction of the power provided by contemporary solar panels.
If it lives up to the claims, this could be a very interesting development. More details at EETimes.